Procedural and one-year outcomes of the BASILICA technique in Europe: the multicentre EURO-BASILICA registry
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The real-world outcomes of the use of the BASILICA (Bioprosthetic or Native Aortic Scallop Intentional Laceration to Prevent Iatrogenic Coronary Artery Obstruction) transcatheter technique in Europe have not been described.
AIMS: We sought to evaluate the procedural and one-year outcomes of BASILICA in patients at high risk for coronary artery obstruction (CAO) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in a multicentre European registry (EURO-BASILICA).
METHODS: Seventy-six patients undergoing BASILICA and TAVI at ten European centres were included. Eighty-five leaflets were identified as targets for BASILICA due to high risk for CAO. The updated Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) definitions were used to determine prespecified endpoints of technical and procedural success and adverse events up to one year.
RESULTS: Treated aortic valves included native (5.3%), surgical bioprosthetic (92.1%) and transcatheter valves (2.6%). Double BASILICA (for both left and right coronary cusps) was performed in 11.8% of patients. Technical success with BASILICA was achieved in 97.7% and resulted in freedom from any target leaflet-related CAO in 90.6% with a low rate of complete CAO (2.4%). Target leaflet-related CAO occurred significantly more often in older and stentless bioprosthetic valves and with higher implantation levels of transcatheter heart valves. Procedural success was 88.2%, and freedom from VARC-3-defined early safety endpoints was 79.0%. One-year survival was 84.2%; 90.5% of patients were in New York Heart Association Functional Class I/II.
CONCLUSIONS: EURO-BASILICA is the first multicentre study evaluating the BASILICA technique in Europe. The technique appeared feasible and effective in preventing TAVI-induced CAO, and one-year clinical outcomes were favourable. The residual risk for CAO requires further study.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | e432-e441 |
Journal | EuroIntervention |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 5 |
Publication status | Published - 7 Aug 2023 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
PubMedCentral | PMC10397663 |
---|---|
Scopus | 85166736949 |
Keywords
Keywords
- Aged, Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery, Aortic Valve/surgery, Bioprosthesis, Coronary Occlusion/surgery, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Humans, Prosthesis Design, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects, Treatment Outcome