Procedural and one-year outcomes of the BASILICA technique in Europe: the multicentre EURO-BASILICA registry

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Mohamed Abdel-Wahab - , Leipzig University (Author)
  • Ines Richter - , Leipzig University (Author)
  • Maurizio Taramasso - , University of Zurich (Author)
  • Axel Unbehaun - , Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin (Author)
  • Tanja Rudolph - , University Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum (Author)
  • Flavio L Ribichini - , University of Verona (Author)
  • Ronald Binder - , Klinikum Wels - Grieskirchen GmbH (Author)
  • Joachim Schofer - , Asklepios Klinik St. Georg (Author)
  • Norman Mangner - , Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology (at Dresden Heart Centre), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Jan-Henk Dambrink - , Isala Hospital Zwolle (Author)
  • Blanca Trejo-Velasco - , Leipzig University (Author)
  • Holger Thiele - , Leipzig University (Author)
  • Mitsunobu Kitamura - , Leipzig University (Author)
  • Jonas Lanz - , Inselspital University Hospital Bern (Author)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The real-world outcomes of the use of the BASILICA (Bioprosthetic or Native Aortic Scallop Intentional Laceration to Prevent Iatrogenic Coronary Artery Obstruction) transcatheter technique in Europe have not been described.

AIMS: We sought to evaluate the procedural and one-year outcomes of BASILICA in patients at high risk for coronary artery obstruction (CAO) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in a multicentre European registry (EURO-BASILICA).

METHODS: Seventy-six patients undergoing BASILICA and TAVI at ten European centres were included. Eighty-five leaflets were identified as targets for BASILICA due to high risk for CAO. The updated Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) definitions were used to determine prespecified endpoints of technical and procedural success and adverse events up to one year.

RESULTS: Treated aortic valves included native (5.3%), surgical bioprosthetic (92.1%) and transcatheter valves (2.6%). Double BASILICA (for both left and right coronary cusps) was performed in 11.8% of patients. Technical success with BASILICA was achieved in 97.7% and resulted in freedom from any target leaflet-related CAO in 90.6% with a low rate of complete CAO (2.4%). Target leaflet-related CAO occurred significantly more often in older and stentless bioprosthetic valves and with higher implantation levels of transcatheter heart valves. Procedural success was 88.2%, and freedom from VARC-3-defined early safety endpoints was 79.0%. One-year survival was 84.2%; 90.5% of patients were in New York Heart Association Functional Class I/II.

CONCLUSIONS: EURO-BASILICA is the first multicentre study evaluating the BASILICA technique in Europe. The technique appeared feasible and effective in preventing TAVI-induced CAO, and one-year clinical outcomes were favourable. The residual risk for CAO requires further study.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e432-e441
JournalEuroIntervention
Volume19
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 7 Aug 2023
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMedCentral PMC10397663
Scopus 85166736949

Keywords

Keywords

  • Aged, Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery, Aortic Valve/surgery, Bioprosthesis, Coronary Occlusion/surgery, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Humans, Prosthesis Design, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects, Treatment Outcome