Probleme und Kontroversen in der Behandlung von Sprunggelenkfrakturen

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

Abstract

Ankle fractures are the most frequent injuries of a load-bearing joint. Their treatment belongs to the daily routine in trauma surgery. However, despite an increased understanding of the mechanism of injury and relatively straightforward fixation techniques, the medium- to long-term results are often less than satisfactory. The following article therefore explicitly focusses on unsolved problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures in the light of the current literature. These include the therapeutic and prognostic relevance of frequently used classification systems, criteria for the indication for surgery, frequent hazards in internal fixation, the question of whether and how to fix the posterior malleolus, and the detection and treatment of syndesmotic instability. Furthermore, trauma surgeons face the increasing incidence of ankle fractures in the elderly. The presence of osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus and neuropathic osteoarthropathy represents a special challenge.

Translated title of the contribution
Problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures

Details

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)847-860
Number of pages14
JournalUnfallchirurg
Volume114
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 21779900
ORCID /0000-0002-8691-8423/work/162842633

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • Ankle fractures, Charcot foot, Pathomechanics, Posterior tibia fragment, Tibiofibular syndesmosis