Potential proton and photon dose degradation in advanced head and neck cancer patients by intratherapy changes

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Kristin Stützer - , University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Annika Jakobi - , University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Anna Bandurska-Luque - , University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Steffen Barczyk - , University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Carolin Arnsmeyer - , University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Steffen Löck - , OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, OncoRay - National Centre for Radiation Research in Oncology (Author)
  • Christian Richter - , Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden (Author)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evaluation of dose degradation by anatomic changes for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) relative to intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) and identification of potential indicators for IMPT treatment plan adaptation.

METHODS: For 31 advanced HNC datasets, IMPT and IMRT plans were recalculated on a computed tomography scan (CT) taken after about 4 weeks of therapy. Dose parameter changes were determined for the organs at risk (OARs) spinal cord, brain stem, parotid glands, brachial plexus, and mandible, for the clinical target volume (CTV) and the healthy tissue outside planning target volume (PTV). Correlation of dose degradation with target volume changes and quality of rigid CT matching was investigated.

RESULTS: Recalculated IMPT dose distributions showed stronger degradation than the IMRT doses. OAR analysis revealed significant changes in parotid median dose (IMPT) and near maximum dose (D1ml ) of spinal cord (IMPT, IMRT) and mandible (IMPT). OAR dose parameters remained lower in IMPT cases. CTV coverage (V95% ) and overdose (V107% ) deteriorated for IMPT plans to (93.4 ± 5.4)% and (10.6 ± 12.5)%, while those for IMRT plans remained acceptable. Recalculated plans showed similarly decreased PTV conformity, but considerable hotspots, also outside the PTV, emerged in IMPT cases. Lower CT matching quality was significantly correlated with loss of PTV conformity (IMPT, IMRT), CTV homogeneity and coverage (IMPT). Target shrinkage correlated with increased dose in brachial plexus (IMRT, IMPT), hotspot generation outside the PTV (IMPT) and lower PTV conformity (IMRT).

CONCLUSIONS: The study underlines the necessity of precise positioning and monitoring of anatomy changes, especially in IMPT which might require adaptation more often. Since OAR doses remained typically below constraints, IMPT plan adaptation will be indicated by target dose degradations.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-113
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of applied clinical medical physics
Volume18
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 28921843
PubMedCentral PMC5689930
ORCID /0000-0002-7017-3738/work/142254030
Scopus 85030094467
ORCID /0000-0003-4261-4214/work/146644853

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • Aged, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Organs at Risk/radiation effects, Photons/therapeutic use, Proton Therapy, Radiometry/methods, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods, Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods