Potential erodibility of semi-arid steppe soils derived from aggregate stability tests

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Moritz Koza - , Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (Author)
  • Julia Pöhlitz - , Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (Author)
  • Aleksey Prays - , Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (Author)
  • Klaus Kaiser - , Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (Author)
  • Robert Mikutta - , Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (Author)
  • Christopher Conrad - , Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (Author)
  • Cordula Vogel - , Institute of Soil Science and Site Ecology, Chair of Soil Resources and Land Use, TUD Dresden University of Technology (Author)
  • Tobias Meinel - , Amazonen-Werke H. Dreyer SE & Co. KG (Author)
  • Kanat Akshalov - , Baraev Kazakh Research Institute for Grain Farming, Kazakhstan (Author)
  • Gerd Schmidt - , Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (Author)

Abstract

Erosion is a severe threat to the sustainable use of agricultural soils. However, the structural resistance of soil against the disruptive forces steppe soils experience under field conditions has not been investigated. Therefore, 132 topsoils under grass- and cropland covering a large range of physico-chemical soil properties (sand: 2–76%, silt: 18–80%, clay: 6–30%, organic carbon: 7.3–64.2 g kg−1, inorganic carbon: 0.0–8.5 g kg−1, pH: 4.8–9.5, electrical conductivity: 32–946 μS cm−1) from northern Kazakhstan were assessed for their potential erodibility using several tests. An adjusted drop-shatter method (low energy input of 60 Joule on a 250-cm3 soil block) was used to estimate the stability of dry soil against weak mechanical forces, such as saltating particles striking the surface causing wind erosion. Three wetting treatments with various conditions and energies (fast wetting, slow wetting, and wet shaking) were applied to simulate different disruptive effects of water. Results indicate that aggregate stability was higher for grassland than cropland soils and declined with decreasing soil organic carbon content. The results of the drop-shatter test suggested that 29% of the soils under cropland were at risk of wind erosion, but only 6% were at high risk (i.e. erodible fraction >60%). In contrast, the fast wetting treatment revealed that 54% of the samples were prone to become “very unstable” and 44% “unstable” during heavy rain or snowmelt events. Even under conditions comparable to light rain events or raindrop impact, 53–59% of the samples were “unstable.” Overall, cropland soils under semi-arid conditions seem much more susceptible to water than wind erosion. Considering future projections of increasing precipitation in Kazakhstan, we conclude that the risk of water erosion is potentially underestimated and needs to be taken into account when developing sustainable land use strategies. Highlights: Organic matter is the important binding agent enhancing aggregation in steppe topsoils. Tillage always declines aggregate stability even without soil organic carbon changes. All croplands soil are prone to wind or water erosion independent of their soil properties. Despite the semi-arid conditions, erosion risk by water seems higher than by wind.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13304
Number of pages20
JournalEuropean journal of soil science
Volume73
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 8 Sept 2022
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

ORCID /0000-0002-6525-2634/work/167215343

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

  • climate change, land use, soil organic carbon, soil texture, water erosion, wind erosion