Postoperative complication management: How do large language models measure up to human expertise?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
Managing postoperative complications is an essential part of surgical care and largely depends on the medical team’s experience. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated immense potential in supporting medical professionals. To evaluate the potential of LLMs in surgical patient care, we compared the performance of three state-of-the-art LLMs in managing postoperative complications to that of a panel of medical professionals based on six postsurgical patient cases. Six realistic postoperative patient cases were queried using GPT-3, GPT-4, and Gemini-Advanced and presented to human surgical caregivers. Humans and LLMs provided a triage assessment, an initial suspected diagnosis, and an acute management plan, including initial diagnostic and therapeutic measures. Responses were compared based on medical contextual correctness, coherence, and completeness. In comparison to human caregivers, GPT-3 and GPT-4 possess considerable competencies in correctly identifying postoperative complications (humans: 76.3% vs. GPT-3: 75.0% vs. GPT-4: 96.7%, p=0.47) as well as triaging patients accordingly (humans: 84.8% vs. GPT-3: 50% vs. GPT-4: 38.3%, p=0.19). With regard to diagnostic and therapeutic management of postoperative complications, GPT-3 and GPT-4 provided comprehensive management plans. Gemini-Advanced often provided no diagnostic or therapeutic recommendations and censored its outputs. In summary, LLMs can accurately interpret postoperative care scenarios and provide comprehensive management recommendations. These results showcase the improvements in LLMs performance with regard to postoperative surgical use cases and provide evidence for their potential value to support and augment surgical routine care.
Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e0000933 |
| Journal | PLOS digital health |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2025 |
| Peer-reviewed | Yes |