Plasma metanephrine for assessing the selectivity of adrenal venous sampling

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Tanja Dekkers - , Radboud University Nijmegen (Author)
  • Jaap Deinum - , Radboud University Nijmegen (Author)
  • Leo J. Schultzekool - , Radboud University Nijmegen (Author)
  • Dirk Blondin - , Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (Author)
  • Oliver Vonend - , Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (Author)
  • Ad R.R.M. Hermus - , Radboud University Nijmegen (Author)
  • Mirko Peitzsch - , Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Lars C. Rump - , Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (Author)
  • Gerald Antoch - , Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (Author)
  • Fred C.G.J. Sweep - , Radboud University Nijmegen (Author)
  • Stefan R. Bornstein - , Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Jacques W.M. Lenders - , Radboud University Nijmegen, Department of Internal Medicine 3 (Author)
  • Holger S. Willenberg - , Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Department of Internal Medicine 3 (Author)
  • Graeme Eisenhofer - , Department of Internal Medicine III (Author)

Abstract

Adrenal vein sampling is used to establish the origins of excess production of adrenal hormones in primary aldosteronism. Correct catheter positioning is confirmed using adrenal vein measurements of cortisol, but this parameter is not always reliable. Plasma metanephrine represents an alternative parameter. The objective of our study was to determine the use of plasma metanephrine concentrations to establish correct catheter positioning during adrenal vein sampling with and without cosyntropin stimulation. We included 52 cosyntropin-stimulated and 34 nonstimulated sequential procedures. Plasma cortisol and metanephrine concentrations were measured in adrenal and peripheral venous samples. Success rates of sampling, using an adrenal to peripheral cortisol selectivity index of 3.0, were compared with success rates of metanephrine using a selectivity index determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Among procedures assessed as selective using cortisol, the adrenal to peripheral vein ratio of metanephrine was 6-fold higher than that of cortisol (94.0 versus 15.5; P<0.0001). There were significant positive relationships between adrenal to peripheral vein ratios of cortisol and metanephrine for cosyntropin-stimulated samplings but not for nonstimulated samplings. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated a plasma metanephrine selectivity index cutoff of 12. Using this cutoff, concordance in sampling success rates determined by cortisol and metanephrine was substantially higher in cosyntropinstimulated than in nonstimulated samplings (98% versus 59%). For the latter procedures, sampling success rates determined by metanephrine were higher (P<0.01) than those determined by cortisol (91% versus 56%). In conclusion, metanephrine provides a superior analyte compared with cortisol in assessing the selectivity of adrenal vein sampling during procedures without cosyntropin stimulation.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1152-1157
Number of pages6
JournalHypertension
Volume62
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 24082051

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

  • Cortisol, Cosyntropin, Hyperaldosteronism, Metanephrine