Perinatal Depression and beyond - Implications for Research Design and Clinical Management
Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial (Lead article) › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
The 2 newly published studies, Smythe et al1 and Sultan et al,2 are systematic reviews (Smythe et al1 also comprises a meta-analysis) dealing with the topic of perinatal mental health (ie, mental health during the time of pregnancy up to 1 year after birth). Smythe et al1 estimated prevalence rates of perinatal depression and anxiety in parental dyads and associated factors. The pooled prevalence of depression was 1.72% (antenatally), 2.37% (0-12 weeks post partum), and 3.18% (3-12 months post partum). Given the paucity of dyadic studies, no prevalence estimate for anxiety could be determined. Sultan et al2 examined the psychometric properties of 10 existing patient-reported outcome measures for assessing maternal postpartum depression. Although all included patient-reported outcome measures demonstrated adequate content validity, only the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale received a class A recommendation (recommended for use). All other patient-reported outcome measures received a class B recommendation (further psychometric evaluation required before recommendation). The authors concluded that the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is currently the best available patient-reported screening measure for maternal postpartum depression.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | E2218978 |
Journal | JAMA network open |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 6 |
Publication status | Published - 24 Jun 2022 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
PubMed | 35749121 |
---|---|
ORCID | /0000-0002-7472-674X/work/142257743 |