Periinterventional Management of Edoxaban in Major Procedures: Results from the DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Christina Köhler - , Department of internal Medicine I (Author)
  • Luise Tittl - , Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Ulrike Hänsel - , Department of internal Medicine I (Author)
  • Evelyn Hammermüller - , Department of internal Medicine I (Author)
  • Sandra Marten - , Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Christiane Naue - , Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Marianne Spindler - , Department of internal Medicine I (Author)
  • Laura Stannek - , Department of internal Medicine I (Author)
  • Kristina Fache - , Department of internal Medicine I (Author)
  • Jan Beyer-Westendorf - , Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)

Abstract

Background  Edoxaban is a non-vitamin K dependent oral anticoagulant (NOAC) licensed for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment or stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Major surgical procedures are not uncommon in anticoagulated patients but data on perioperative edoxaban management are scarce. Patients and Methods  Using data from the prospective DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY, we extracted data on major surgical procedures in edoxaban patients. Periinterventional edoxaban management patterns and rates of outcome events were evaluated until day 30 after procedure. Results  Between 2011 and 2021, 3,448 procedures were identified in edoxaban patients, including 287 (8.3%) major procedures. A scheduled interruption of edoxaban was observed in 284/287 major procedures (99%) with a total median edoxaban interruption time of 11.0 days (25-75th percentile: 5.0-18.0 days). Heparin bridging was documented in 183 procedures (46 prophylactic dosages, 111 intermediate and 26 therapeutic dosages). Overall, 7 (2.4%; 95% CI: 1.2-4.9%) major cardiovascular events (5 VTE, 2 arterial thromboembolic events) and 38 major bleedings (13.2%; 95% CI: 9.8-17.7%) were observed and 6 patients died (2.1%; 95% CI: 1.0-4.5%). Rates of major cardiovascular events with or without heparin bridging were comparable (4/137; 2.9%; 95% CI: 1.1-7.3% vs. 3/82; 3.7%; 95% CI: 1.3-10.2%). Major bleedings occurred numerically more frequent in patients receiving heparin bridging (23/137; 16.8%; 95% CI: 11.5-23.9%) versus procedures without heparin bridging (9/82; 11.0%; 95% CI: 5.9-19.6%). Conclusion  Within the limitations of our study design, real-world periprocedural edoxaban management seems effective and safe. Use of heparin bridging seems to have limited effects on reducing vascular events but may increase bleeding risk.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e251-e261
JournalTH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis
Volume7
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2023
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMedCentral PMC10516686
unpaywall 10.1055/s-0043-1774304

Keywords

Library keywords