Patients' views of involuntary hospital admission after 1 and 3 months: Prospective study in 11 European countries

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Stefan Priebe - , Queen Mary University of London (Author)
  • Christina Katsakou - , Queen Mary University of London (Author)
  • Matthias Glöckner - , University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Algirdas Dembinskas - , Vilnius University (Author)
  • Andrea Fiorillo - , Universita' di Napoli Federico II (Author)
  • Anastasia Karastergiou - , Psychiatric Hospital of Thessaloniki (Author)
  • Andrzej Kiejna - , Wrocław Medical University (Author)
  • Lars Kjellin - , Örebro University (Author)
  • Pitr Nawka - , Psychiatric Oupatient Clinik (Author)
  • George Onchev - , Medical University Sofia (Author)
  • Jiri Raboch - , Charles University Prague (Author)
  • Matthias Schuetzwohl - , Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Zahava Solomon - , Tel Aviv University (Author)
  • Francisco Torres-González - , University of Granada (Author)
  • Duolao Wang - , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Author)
  • Thomas Kallert - , TUD Dresden University of Technology, Soteria Hospital Leipzig (Author)

Abstract

Background: Legislation and practice of involuntary hospital admission vary substantially among European countries, but differences in outcomes have not been studied. Aims: To explore patients' views following involuntary hospitalisation in different European countries. Method: in a prospective study in 11 countries, 2326 consecutive involuntary patients admitted to psychiatric hospital departments were interviewed within 1 week of admission; 1809 were followed up 1 month and 1613 3 months later. Patients' views as to whether the admission was right were the outcome criterion. Results: In the different countries, between 39 and 71% felt the admission was right after 1 month, and between 46 and 86% after 3 months. Females, those living alone and those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia had more negative views. Adjusting for confounding factors, differences between countries were significant. Conclusions: International differences in legislation and practice may be relevant to outcomes and inform improvements in policies, particularly in countries with poorer outcomes.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-185
Number of pages7
JournalBritish journal of psychiatry
Volume196
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 20194537

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

ASJC Scopus subject areas