Pacemaker after Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Prostheses: A Progress Report from the SURD-IR

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Francesco Pollari - , Klinikum Nurnberg (Author)
  • Paolo Berretta - , Marche Polytechnic University (Author)
  • Alberto Albertini - , GVM Care and Research S.p.A. (Author)
  • Thierry Carrel - , University of Bern (Author)
  • Kevin Teoh - , Southlake Regional Health Centre (Author)
  • Bart Meuris - , KU Leuven (Author)
  • Emmanuel Villa - , Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital (Author)
  • Utz Kappert - , TUD Dresden University of Technology (Author)
  • Martin Andreas - , Medical University of Vienna (Author)
  • Marco Solinas - , Heart Hospital Pasquinucci Hospital of Massa (Author)
  • Martin Misfeld - , Leipzig University (Author)
  • Carlo Savini - , University of Bologna (Author)
  • Antonio Fiore - , Hôpital Henri Mondor (Author)
  • Malakh Shrestha - , Hannover Medical School (MHH) (Author)
  • Giuseppe Santarpino - , Klinikum Nurnberg (Author)
  • Gian Luca Martinelli - , Clinica S. Gaudenzio (Author)
  • Carmelo Mignosa - , Ismett (Author)
  • Mattia Glauber - , Sant'Ambrogio Clinic (Author)
  • Tristan Yan - , Core (Author)
  • Theodor Fischlein - , Klinikum Nurnberg (Author)
  • Marco Di Eusanio - , Marche Polytechnic University (Author)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the need for postoperative permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (SuRD-AVR) in the context of a progress report from a large multicenter international registry (SURD-IR).

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 4,166 patients who underwent SuRD-AVR between 2008 and 2019. The primary outcome was the need for PPI before discharge. The study population was analyzed separately according to the implanted prostheses (Su cohort and RD cohort). Each cohort was divided into two groups based on the operation date: an early group ("EG" = 2008-2016) and a late group ("LG" = 2017-2019).

RESULTS: The rate of PPI decreased significantly in the Su cohort over time (EG = 10.8% vs LG = 6.3%, p < 0.001). In the Su cohort, a decrease in age, risk profile, and incidence of bicuspid aortic valve, increased use of anterior right thoracotomy, reduction of cardiopulmonary bypass time and of associated procedures, and more frequent use of smaller prostheses were observed over time. In the RD cohort, the rate of PPI was stable over time (EG = 8.8% vs LG = 9.3%, p = 0.8). In this cohort, a younger age, lower risk profile, and higher incidence of concomitant septal myectomy were observed over time.

CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed a significant decrease in the PPI rate in patients who underwent Su-AVR over time. Patient selection as well as surgical improvements and a more accurate sizing could be correlated with this phenomenon. The RD cohort revealed no significant differences either in patient's characteristics or in PPI rate between the two time periods.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)557-565
Number of pages9
JournalThe thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon
Volume71
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023
Peer-reviewedYes
Externally publishedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85141823926

Keywords

Keywords

  • aortic valve and root, complications, mini-thoracotomy), minimally invasive surgery (includes port access, morbidity), outcomes (includes mortality, surgery