On the PET Workshop Panel “Mix Cascades Versus Peer-to-Peer: Is One Concept Superior?”
Research output: Contribution to book/conference proceedings/anthology/report › Conference contribution › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
After almost two decades of research on anonymous network communication the development has forked into two main directions, namely Mix cascades and peer-to-peer (P2P) networks. As these design options have implications on the achievable anonymity and performance, this paper aims to elaborate the advantages and disadvantages of either concept. After clarifying the scope of the discussion, we present arguments for Mix cascades and P2P designs on multiple areas of interest: the level of anonymity, the incentives to cooperate, aspects of availability, and performance issues. Pointed thesis and antithesis are given for both sides, before a final synthesis tries to articulate the status quo of the discussion.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Privacy Enhancing Technologies |
Publisher | Springer, Berlin [u. a.] |
Pages | 243-255 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Volume | 3424 |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
Publication series
Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 3424 |
---|---|
ISSN | 0302-9743 |
Conference
Title | 4th International Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, PET 2004 |
---|---|
Duration | 26 - 28 May 2004 |
City | Toronto, Ont. |
Country | Canada |
External IDs
ORCID | /0000-0002-0466-562X/work/142246157 |
---|