Multivariate Platelet Analysis Differentiates between Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Healthy Controls at First Clinical Diagnosis

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Isabella Wiest - , Heidelberg University , German Red Cross Blood Donation Service Baden-Württemberg/Hessen (Author)
  • Tim Wiemers - , Heidelberg University  (Author)
  • Max Joseph Kraus - , Practice Geiselgasteig, University of Koblenz (Author)
  • Heiko Neeb - , University of Koblenz, Koblenz University of Applied Sciences (Author)
  • Erwin F. Strasser - , University Hospital at the Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (Author)
  • Lucrezia Hausner - , Central Institute of Mental Health (CIMH) (Author)
  • Lutz Frölich - , Central Institute of Mental Health (CIMH) (Author)
  • Peter Bugert - , Heidelberg University  (Author)

Abstract

Background: Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is challenging, and easily accessible biomarkers are an unmet need. Blood platelets frequently serve as peripheral model for studying AD pathogenesis and might represent a reasonable biomarker source. Objective: In the present study, we investigated the potential to differentiate AD patients from healthy controls (HC) based on blood count, platelet morphology, and function as well as molecular markers at the time of first clinical diagnosis. Methods: Blood samples from 40 AD patients and 29 age-matched HC were included for determination of 78 parameter by blood counting, platelet morphometry, aggregometry, flow cytometry (CD62P, CD63, activated fibrinogen receptor), protein quantification of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α7 (nAChRα7) and caveolin-1 (CAV-1), and miRNA quantification (miR-26b, miR-199a, miR-335). Group comparison between patients and controls was performed in univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Results: AD patients showed significantly lower aggregation response to ADP and arachidonic acid and significantly decreased CD62P and CD63 surface expression induced by ADP and U46619 compared to HC. Relative nAChRα7 and CAV-1 expression was significantly higher AD platelets than in HC. Multivariate analysis of 63 parameter revealed significant differences between AD patients and healthy controls. The best performing feature model revealed a sensitivity of 96.6%, a specificity of 80.0%, and a positive predictive value of 89.3%. No grouping could be achieved by using single parameter groups. Conclusion: Significant differences between platelet characteristics from AD patients and HC at the time of first clinical diagnosis were observed. The best performing parameter can be used as a blood-based biomarker for AD diagnosis in a multivariate model in addition to the standardized mental tests.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)993-1004
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Alzheimer's disease
Volume71
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Peer-reviewedYes
Externally publishedYes

External IDs

PubMed 31450503

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • Aggregometry, Alzheimer's disease, blood-based biomarker, platelet morphology