Monitoring in Thoracic Anesthesia: EACTAIC Consensus Document
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
- Mansoura University
- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
- Medical University of Vienna
- University of Debrecen
- Outcomes Research Consortium
- Radboud University Nijmegen
- Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar Universitesi
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
- Imperial College London
- Semmelweis University
- Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB)
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
- Istanbul University
- Aalborg University
- University of Valencia
- ULSS6 Euganea Cittadella (PD)
- University Medical Centre Ljubljana
- University of Cape Town
- Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
- University of Barcelona
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena
- Juntendo University
- The Aga Khan University Kenya
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Fort de France
- Sant'Andrea Hospital
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
- IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano (Milano)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC)
- SANADOR Clinical Hospital
- University of Lausanne
- Righospitalet
- University of Glasgow
- Kore University of Enna
- UOC Rianimazione PO Giovanni Paolo II
- Ghent University
- Mersin University
Abstract
This is the first part of a series of articles prepared for a comprehensive, international, and professional society–approved consensus project to advise on thoracic anesthesia. It represents the views and structured opinions of experts delegated to the General Management: Monitoring Task Force of the Thoracic Subcommittee of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC). This review highlights international leaders’ main concepts and expert opinions on how monitoring is the core task of anesthesiologists involved in the care of thoracic patients, providing recommendations for assessing principal organ systems and using different devices in routine and specialized scenarios. The consensus statement addresses the following main clinical topics and questions: (1) What constitutes standard basic and advanced monitoring? (2) What are the overall goals and means of monitoring the respiratory system? (3) How shall we monitor the circulation in thoracic anesthesia? (4) What are the main aspects of monitoring neuromuscular blockade? (5) What are the best practices for monitoring the depth of anesthesia and neurologic function? (6) What are the research priorities for thoracic anesthesia monitoring? (7) The authors briefly discuss how these recommendations relate to the concepts of good clinical practice and enhanced recovery. This document was developed and formally evaluated by senior clinicians representing the core membership of the EACTAIC Thoracic Subspecialty Committee from Europe, the United States, Africa, and the Middle East. Although a high-level evidence base is generally limited and significant controversies remain, all recommendations of the Task Force achieved an agreed (>60%), strong (>80%), or sometimes full (>95%) consensus. This consensus should serve as a consolidation of diverse practices of thoracic anesthesia and a starting point toward obtaining more robust evidence to further enhance our clinical practice in the future.
Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia |
| Early online date | 18 Dec 2025 |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 18 Dec 2025 |
| Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
| PubMed | 41419417 |
|---|
Keywords
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Keywords
- cerebral oxygenation, circulation, depth of anesthesia, monitoring, neuromuscular transmission, respiration, thoracic anesthesia