Monitor yourself! Deficient error-related brain activity predicts real-life self-control failures

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Abstract

Despite their immense relevance, the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying real-life self-control failures (SCFs) are insufficiently understood. Whereas previous studies have shown that SCFs were associated with decreased activity in the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG; a region involved in cognitive control), here we consider the possibility that the reduced implementation of cognitive control in individuals with low self-control may be due to impaired performance monitoring. Following a brain-as-predictor approach, we combined experience sampling of daily SCFs with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a Stroop task. In our sample of 118 participants, proneness to SCF was reliably predicted by low error-related activation of a performance-monitoring network (comprising anterior mid-cingulate cortex, presupplementary motor area, and anterior insula), low posterror rIFG activation, and reduced posterror slowing. Remarkably, these neural and behavioral measures predicted variability in SCFs beyond what was predicted by self-reported trait self-control. These results suggest that real-life SCFs may result from deficient performance monitoring, leading to reduced recruitment of cognitive control after responses that conflict with superordinate goals.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)622-637
Number of pages16
JournalCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience
Volume18
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85045233776
ORCID /0000-0002-1612-3932/work/142251078
ORCID /0000-0001-5398-5569/work/150329445

Keywords

Keywords

  • Adult, Attention/physiology, Brain/diagnostic imaging, Brain Mapping, Executive Function/physiology, Female, Humans, Individuality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Self-Control, Stroop Test, Young Adult