Measuring Atopic Eczema Control and Itch Intensity in Clinical Practice: A Consensus Statement From the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema in Clinical Practice (HOME-CP) Initiative

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Yael A Leshem - , Tel Aviv University (Author)
  • Joanne R Chalmers - , University of Nottingham (Author)
  • Christian Apfelbacher - , Nanyang Technological University (Author)
  • Norito Katoh - , Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (Author)
  • Louise A A Gerbens - , Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) (Author)
  • Jochen Schmitt - , Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (Author)
  • Phyllis I Spuls - , Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) (Author)
  • Kim S Thomas - , University of Nottingham (Author)
  • Laura Howells - , University of Nottingham (Author)
  • Hywel C Williams - , University of Nottingham (Author)
  • Eric L Simpson - , Oregon Health and Science University (Author)

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Measuring outcomes in clinical practice can aid patient care, quality improvement, and real-world evidence generation. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) Clinical Practice initiative is developing a list of validated, feasible instruments to measure atopic eczema in clinical care. Prior work identified symptoms and long-term control as the most important domains to measure in clinical practice. The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) and the Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Index (PO-SCORAD) were recommended by consensus to measure symptoms in clinical practice, but a need for instruments to measure itch intensity specifically was recognized. The HOME group also previously decided that long-term control should be captured by repeated measurements of eczema control. Recommended instruments to measure eczema control in clinical practice have not been defined.

OBJECTIVE: To recommend instruments to measure eczema control and itch intensity in patients with atopic eczema in clinical practice.

EVIDENCE REVIEW: Available instruments to measure eczema control and itch intensity were identified through systematic reviews, informing a consensus process held at the HOME VIII virtual online meeting (October 6 and October 9, 2020). Feasibility aspects were highlighted to optimize instrument selection for the clinical practice. Consensus on an instrument was reached if fewer than 30% of the voters disagreed.

FINDINGS: Of 7 identified instruments, the Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP) and Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) were the recommended instruments to measure eczema control (3 of 63 [5%] and 7 of 69 [10%] of voters disagreed, respectively). A single-question patient global assessment garnered support, but the current available instrument did not reach consensus. Six available itch-intensity instruments were identified. Of them, 3 instruments were recommended by consensus: a peak 24-hour numeric rating scale (NRS)-itch, and 1-week NRS-itch instruments from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Itch Questionnaire, measuring average and peak itch (11 of 63 [17%], 14 of 63 [22%], and 16 of 59 [27%] voters disagreed, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Clinicians and patients are encouraged to incorporate these well-validated, quick-to-perform, and easy-to-use instruments into their clinic, selecting the instruments that best fit their need. These assessments are meant to enhance, not replace, the patient-clinician encounter, and to support real-world research and health care improvement.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1429-1435
Number of pages7
JournalJAMA dermatology
Volume158
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2022
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85139985547

Keywords

Keywords

  • Humans, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Dermatitis, Atopic/complications, Eczema/diagnosis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Pruritus/diagnosis, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index