Material screening for future diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects: Modeling of binary and ternary metal alloys and detailed analysis of their barrier performance

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Bettina Wehring - , Fraunhofer Institute for Photonic Microsystems (Author)
  • Firat Karakus - , Fraunhofer Institute for Photonic Microsystems (Author)
  • Lukas Gerlich - , Fraunhofer Institute for Photonic Microsystems (Author)
  • Benjamin Lilienthal-Uhlig - , Fraunhofer Institute for Photonic Microsystems (Author)
  • Michael Hecker - , Global Foundries Dresden (Author)
  • Christoph Leyens - , Chair of Materials Technology, TUD Dresden University of Technology (Author)

Abstract

One of the challenges in the semiconductor industry is to find new barrier materials and copper (Cu) alternative solutions in interconnects. In this work, we focused to find alternative diffusion barrier materials. Different binary (CoMo, CoRu, CoTa, CoW, MoRu, RuTa, RuW) and ternary (CoMoTa, CoRuTa, MoRuTa) metal alloys were evaluated theoretically with the Miedema model to find the amorphous phase composition range. Afterward, thin films of the alloys with various compositions were deposited by magnetron sputtering and theoretical values were compared to the experimental results. From the experimental measurements, which included grazing incidence x-ray diffraction analysis and resistivity measurements, suitable binary and ternary alloys were chosen for diffusion analysis. By annealing thin film stacks at temperatures ranging from 500 to 675 ° C, diffusion was induced and detected by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiles. Seventeen alloys were evaluated by their diffusion barrier effectiveness, and five of those, which include Ru 60 Ta 40 , Ru 45 W 55 , Mo 47 Ru 53 , Mo 36 Ru 50 Ta 14 , and Co 40 Mo 35 Ta 25 , showed excellent barrier properties against copper diffusion. Furthermore, all of the stated materials have a lower resistivity than TaN. Last, the adhesion of the best performing alloys to SiCOH and Cu was evaluated by the modified edge lift-off test. Only Ru 45 W 55 had reasonable adhesion at both interfaces. The other materials showed low adhesion strength to Cu, which would make an adhesion promoter (liner), such as cobalt, necessary for the integration.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number215302
JournalJournal of applied physics
Volume135
Issue number21
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jun 2024
Peer-reviewedYes

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas