Mass flow of antibiotics in a wastewater treatment plant focusing on removal variations due to operational parameters
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are not designed to purposefully eliminate antibiotics and therefore many previous investigations have been carried out to assess their fate in biological wastewater treatment processes. In order to consolidate previous findings regarding influencing factors like the solid and hydraulic retention time an intensive monitoring was carried out in a municipal WWTP in Germany. Over a period of 12 months daily samples were taken from the in- and effluent as well as diverse sludge streams. The 14 selected antibiotics and one metabolite cover the following classes: cephalosporins, diaminopyrimidines, fluoroquinolones, lincosamide, macrolides, penicillins, sulfonamides and tetracyclines.
Out of the 15 investigated substances, the removal of only clindamycin and ciprofloxacin show significant correlations to SRT, temperature, HRT and nitrogen removal. The dependency of clindamycin's removal could be related to the significant negative removal (i.e. production) of clindamycin in the treatment process and was corrected using the human metabolite clindamycin-sulfoxide. The average elimination was adjusted from -225% to 3% which suggests that clindamycin can be considered as an inert substance during the wastewater treatment Process. Based on the presented data, the mass flow analysis revealed that macrolides, clindamycin/clindamycin-sulfoxide and trimethoprim were mainly released with the effluent, while penicillins, cephalosporins as well as sulfamethoxazole were partly degraded in the studied WWTP. Furthermore, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin are the only antibiotics under investigation with a significant mass fraction bound to primary, excess and digested sludge. Nevertheless, the sludge concentrations are highly inconsistent which leads to questionable results. It remains unclear whether the inconsistencies are due to insufficiencies in sampling and/or analytical determination or if the fluctuations can be considered reasonable for digesters. Hence, future investigations have to address antibiotic's temporal dynamics during the sludge treatment to decide whether or not the widely reported standard deviations of sludge concentrations reflect realistic fluctuations. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 779-788 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Science of the Total Environment |
Volume | 538 |
Publication status | Published - 15 Dec 2015 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
Scopus | 84940490426 |
---|---|
PubMed | 26340581 |
WOS | 000363348900075 |
ORCID | /0000-0001-9033-1847/work/139669787 |
ORCID | /0000-0003-1526-997X/work/142247231 |
ORCID | /0000-0003-1054-8080/work/142657163 |
Keywords
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Keywords
- Wastewater treatment, Sludge, Antibiotics, Elimination, Removal, Mass flow analysis, SEWAGE-TREATMENT PLANTS, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, PHARMACEUTICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUNDS, RETENTION TIME, FATE, SLUDGE, MICROPOLLUTANTS, SORPTION, BALANCE, FLUOROQUINOLONES