Long-term survival of patients with central or > 7 cm T4 N0/1 M0 non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive concurrent radiochemotherapy in comparison to trimodality treatment

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Nika Guberina - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)
  • Christoph Pöttgen - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)
  • Martin Schuler - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)
  • Maja Guberina - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)
  • Georgios Stamatis - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)
  • Till Plönes - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)
  • Martin Metzenmacher - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)
  • Dirk Theegarten - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)
  • Thomas Gauler - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)
  • Kaid Darwiche - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)
  • Clemens Aigner - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)
  • Wilfried E.E. Eberhardt - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)
  • Martin Stuschke - , University of Duisburg-Essen (Author)

Abstract

Background: To examine long-term-survival of cT4 cN0/1 cM0 non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients undergoing definitive radiochemotherapy (ccRTx/CTx) in comparison to the trimodality treatment, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery, at a high volume lung cancer center. Methods: All consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed NSCLC (cT4 cN0/1 cM0) with a curative-intent-to-treat ccRTx/CTx were included between 01.01.2001 and 01.07.2019. Mediastinal involvement was excluded by systematic EBUS-TBNA or mediastinoscopy. Following updated T4-stage-defining-criteria initial staging was reassessed by an expert-radiologist according to UICC-guidelines [8th edition]. Outcomes were compared with previously reported results from patients of the same institution with identical inclusion criteria, who had been treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and resection. Factors for treatment selection were documented. Endpoints were overall-survival (OS), progression-free-survival (PFS), and cumulative incidences of isolated loco-regional failures, distant metastases, secondary tumors as well as non-cancer deaths within the first year. Results: Altogether 46 consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed NSCLC cT4 cN0/1 cM0 [cN0 in 34 and cN1 in 12 cases] underwent ccRTx/CTx after induction chemotherapy (iCTx). Median follow-up was 133 months. OS-rates at 3-, 5-, and 7-years were 74.9%, 57.4%, and 57.4%, respectively. Absolute OS-rate of ccRTx/CTx at 5 years were within 10% of the trimodality treatment reference group (Log-Rank p = 0.184). The cumulative incidence of loco-regional relapse was higher after iCTx + ccRT/CTx (15.2% vs. 0% at 3 years, p = 0.0012, Gray’s test) while non-cancer deaths in the first year were lower than in the trimodality reference group (0% vs 9.1%, p = 0.0360, Gray’s test). None of the multiple recorded prognostic parameters were significantly associated with survival after iCTx + ccRT/CTx: Propensity score weighting for adjustment of prognostic factors between iCTx + ccRT/CTx and trimodality treatment did not change the results of the comparisons. Conclusions: Patients with cT4 N0/1 M0 NSCLC have comparable OS with ccRTx/CTx and trimodality treatment. Loco-regional relapses were higher and non-cancer related deaths lower with ccRTx/CTx. Definitive radiochemotherapy is an adequate alternative for patients with an increased risk of surgery-related morbidity.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number126
Number of pages14
JournalRadiation oncology
Volume17
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2022
Peer-reviewedYes
Externally publishedYes

External IDs

PubMed 35842712

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • Definitive radiochemotherapy, Non-small cell lung cancer, TNM-staging

Library keywords