Linksschenkelstimulation ist der klassischen kardialen Resynchronisationstherapie überlegen: Pro und Contra
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an effective method for increasing quality of life and life expectancy for many patients with heart failure. Due to the good results, this procedure is used frequently in Germany and has established itself as a class I indication in heart failure therapy. In addition to His bundle pacing, left bundle branch pacing has now also made a name for itself, as it shows a good success rate and can be used in a wider range of patients. Now the question arises as to whether left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic biventricular pacing and what the evidence situation is in this respect. This question shall be discussed in this article considering current studies and guideline recommendations.
| Translated title of the contribution | Left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic cardiac resynchronisation therapy Pros and cons |
|---|
Details
| Original language | German |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 256-262 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2024 |
| Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
| Scopus | 85209376581 |
|---|
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
Keywords
- Bundle-Branch Block/therapy, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods, Evidence-Based Medicine, Heart Failure/therapy, Humans, Treatment Outcome