Less favorable clinical outcome after diagnostic and interventional double balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
Background and study aims: Double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is a new endoscopic technique that allows diagnosis and therapeutic interventions of small-bowel lesions. One of the main indications for DBE is suspected small-bowel bleeding (SSBB). Data about clinical outcome after DBE are limited. The aim of the present study was to prospectively assess the short-term clinical outcome of this procedure. Patients and methods: Of all consecutive patients undergoing DBE for various indications, follow-up results in patients with SSBB were analyzed. Standardized questionnaires were used, including assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms, especially signs of gastrointestinal bleeding, blood transfusions, demand for re-intervention, and hospitalization. Results: Of a total of 180 DBEs performed in 124 patients during a 2-year period, SSBB was the indication in 84 patients (M/F=46/38; mean age 63 years) who underwent a total of 111 DBEs. Of these patients 52 could be followed (mean follow-up 2 months, range 1-5 months). In this subgroup, positive findings were obtained in 30 (mostly angiodysplasia), with therapeutic interventions being performed in 18 of these patients. At follow-up, the rate of re-bleeding in patients who had undergone interventions (20%) was similar to that in patients who had not (18%). Conclusion: In this pilot study, DBE did not seem to have a major effect on re-bleeding. Better patient selection or modification of therapeutic regimens appears to be necessary to better utilize DBE in SSBB.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 731-734 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Endoscopy |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 9 |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2008 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
PubMed | 18698535 |
---|