LANDMARK comparison of early outcomes of newer-generation Myval transcatheter heart valve series with contemporary valves (Sapien and Evolut) in real-world individuals with severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis: a randomised non-inferiority trial

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • LANDMARK trial investigators - (Author)
  • Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology (at Dresden Heart Centre)
  • Dresden Heart Centre
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
  • National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases Slovakia
  • University Medical Centre Ljubljana
  • Amphia Hospital
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (UMC+)
  • Zuyderland
  • North Estonia Medical Centre
  • University Hospital Dubrava
  • Semmelweis University
  • Isala Clinics
  • European Interbalkan Medical Center Thessaloniki
  • Wrocław Medical University
  • St. Antonius Hospital
  • Doctor Negrín University Hospital
  • Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia
  • NOVA University Lisbon
  • Université de Lille
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
  • Gruppo San Donato
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
  • IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele - Milano
  • Auckland District Health Board
  • Hippokration General Hospital
  • Hôpital Henri Mondor
  • Utrecht University
  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
  • University of Gothenburg
  • Justus Liebig University Giessen
  • Kerckhoff Clinic
  • University Medical Center Freiburg
  • University of Freiburg
  • University Hospital Center Split
  • Hospital Son Dureta
  • East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
  • University of Galway
  • Cardiovascular European Research Center

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is an established, guideline-endorsed treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Precise sizing of the balloon-expandable Myval transcatheter heart valve (THV) series with the aortic annulus is facilitated by increasing its diameter in 1·5 mm increments, compared with the usual 3 mm increments in valve size. The LANDMARK trial aimed to show non-inferiority of the Myval THV series compared with the contemporary THVs Sapien Series (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) or Evolut Series (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

METHODS: In this prospective, multinational, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial across 31 hospitals in 16 countries (Germany, France, Sweden, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, New Zealand, Portugal, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Estonia, and Brazil), 768 participants with severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis were randomly assigned (1:1) to the Myval THV or a contemporary THV. Eligibility was primarily decided by the heart team in accordance with 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines. As per the criteria of the third Valve Academic Research Consortium, the primary endpoint at 30 days was a composite of all-cause mortality, all stroke, bleeding (types 3 and 4), acute kidney injury (stages 2-4), major vascular complications, moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation, and conduction system disturbances resulting in a permanent pacemaker implantation. Non-inferiority of the study device was tested in the intention-to-treat population using a non-inferiority margin of 10·44% and assuming an event rate of 26·10%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04275726, and EudraCT, 2020-000137-40, and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS: Between Jan 6, 2021, and Dec 5, 2023, 768 participants with severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis were randomly assigned, 384 to the Myval THV and 384 to a contemporary THV. 369 (48%) participants had their sex recorded as female, and 399 (52%) as male. The mean age of participants was 80·0 years (SD 5·7) for those treated with the Myval THV and 80·4 years (5·4) for those treated with a contemporary THV. Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores were the same in both groups (Myval 2·6% [IQR 1·7-4·0] vs contemporary 2·6% [1·7-4·0]). The primary endpoint showed non-inferiority of the Myval (25%) compared with contemporary THV (27%), with a risk difference of -2·3% (one-sided upper 95% CI 3·8, pnon-inferiority<0·0001). No significant difference was seen in individual components of the primary composite endpoint.

INTERPRETATION: In individuals with severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis, the Myval THV met its primary endpoint at 30 days.

FUNDING: Meril Life Sciences.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2695-2708
Number of pages14
JournalThe Lancet
Volume403
Issue number10445
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jun 2024
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85195311132

Keywords

Keywords

  • Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Aortic Valve/surgery, Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Postoperative Complications/epidemiology, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design, Severity of Illness Index, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods, Treatment Outcome