It’s not distance but similarity of distance: changing stimulus relations affect the control of action sequences

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

Abstract

Interacting with our environment happens on different levels of complexity: While there are individual and simple actions like an isolated button press, most actions are more complex and involve sequences of simpler actions. The degree to which multiple simple actions are represented as one action sequence can be measured via so-called response-response binding effects. When two or more responses are executed consecutively, they are integrated into one representation so that repetition of one response can start retrieval of the other. Executing such an action sequence typically involves responding to multiple objects or stimuli. Here, we investigated whether the spatial relation of these stimuli affects action sequence execution. To that end, we varied the distance between stimuli in a response-response binding task. Stimulus distance might affect response-response binding effects in one of two ways: It might directly affect the representation of the response sequence, making integration and retrieval between responses more likely if the responses relate to close stimuli. Alternatively, the similarity of stimulus distribution during integration and retrieval might be decisive, leading to larger binding effects if stimulus distance is identical during integration and retrieval. We found stronger binding effects with constant than with changing stimulus distance, indicating that action integration and retrieval can easily affect performance also if responses refer to separated objects. However, this effect on performance is diminished by changing spatial distribution of stimuli at the times of integration and retrieval.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1727-1736
Number of pages10
JournalPsychological research
Volume88
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 38733538
Mendeley 00e25957-6678-3247-9f46-ff070408aeff
ORCID /0000-0002-2989-9561/work/171065415