Isotope labeling reveals contribution of newly fixed carbon to carbon storage and monoterpenes production under water deficit and carbon limitation

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Jianbei Huang - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Author)
  • Lenka Forkelová - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Author)
  • Sybille B. Unsicker - , Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (Author)
  • Matthias Forkel - , Junior Professorship in Environmental Remote Sensing, Vienna University of Technology (Author)
  • David W.T. Griffith - , University of Wollongong (Author)
  • Susan Trumbore - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Author)
  • Henrik Hartmann - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Author)

Abstract

Secondary metabolites play important roles in plant responses to environmental stress but may also represent a large carbon (C) cost, resulting in trade-offs with other C sinks like growth and storage. However, it remains uncertain how such trade-offs may vary with changes in resource availability including water and CO 2 availability. We conducted a glasshouse experiment with peppermint (Mentha x piperita L.) exposed to four treatments: control (sufficient irrigation and near-ambient CO 2 ), water deficit (50% irrigation and near-ambient CO 2 ), CO 2 limitation (sufficient irrigation and below-ambient CO 2 ) and the combination of water and CO 2 deficits. Continuous 13 CO 2 labelling was used to trace allocation of newly-assimilated C. Concentrations of soluble sugars significantly increased under water deficit but decreased along with aboveground biomass under low CO 2 , while monoterpene concentrations remained relatively constant, independent of treatments. Under water deficit, there were no differences in allocation of new vs old C to monoterpenes production, structural growth and storage; plants grown under low CO 2 even invested proportionally more newly-assimilated C for monoterpenes production, suggesting a preferential allocation to defense at the expense of growth. We concluded that C allocation to monoterpenes is actively regulated in coordination with growth and storage under water and C stresses, consistent with an optimal defense strategy to protect young tissues.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-344
Number of pages12
JournalEnvironmental and experimental botany : an international journal
Volume162
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

ORCID /0000-0003-0363-9697/work/142252081

Keywords

Keywords

  • Carbon allocation, Carbon limitation, Drought, Isotope labeling, Monoterpenes, Secondary metabolites

Library keywords