Irritancy expectancy alters odor perception: evidence from olfactory event-related potential research

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Patricia J Bulsing - , Utrecht University (Author)
  • Monique A M Smeets - , Utrecht University (Author)
  • Christian Gemeinhardt - , Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (Author)
  • Martin Laverman - , Utrecht University (Author)
  • Benno Schuster - , Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (Author)
  • Marcel A Van den Hout - , Utrecht University (Author)
  • Thomas Hummel - , Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (Author)

Abstract

The aim of the present research was to investigate the influences of cognition on temporal processing of olfactory information in a health-relevant context. We investigated whether expecting an odor to cause adverse health effects alters perception of that odor. An irritation-free odor (Study 1: H(2)S; Study 2: phenyl ethyl alcohol [PEA]) was presented after which participants expected to experience either adverse sensory irritation (caused by intranasal CO(2) presentation) in one condition or no adverse effects in another condition, depending on a previously presented visual cue. Olfactory event-related potentials (OERPs) were measured to assess effects of expectations on the temporal course of olfactory processing. When participants expected irritancy after perceiving the odor of H(2)S, N1 and P3 peak amplitude and N1 latency were increased and shortened, respectively, suggesting more intense and faster processing of the odor as well as effects on salience and anticipation of sensory irritation. When the odor was PEA, only the N1 amplitude was increased. These results, obtained with OERP, provide converging evidence for comparable conclusions regarding the influence of cognition on odor perception reached with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, the results suggest that a priori hedonic valence of an odor affects how susceptible the olfactory percept is to modulation via expectations.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2749-56
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of neurophysiology
Volume104
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 78049520502
ORCID /0000-0001-9713-0183/work/164619747

Keywords

Keywords

  • Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cerebral Cortex/physiology, Cues, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials/physiology, Female, Humans, Irritants, Male, Odorants, Olfactory Perception/physiology