Integration of intention and outcome for moral judgment in frontotemporal dementia: Brain structural signatures

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Sandra Baez - , Favaloro University, National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Diego Portales University (Author)
  • P. Kanske - , Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (Author)
  • D. Matallana - , Hospital San Ignacio, Universidad Javeriana (Author)
  • P. Montañes - , Universidad Nacional de Colombia (Author)
  • P. Reyes - , Hospital San Ignacio, Universidad Javeriana (Author)
  • A. Slachevsky - , Universidad de Chile, Hospital del Salvador, Clínica Alemana de Santiago (Author)
  • C. Matus - , Hospital de Carabineros, Fundación Médica San Cristobal (Author)
  • N.S. Vigliecca - , National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Cordoba (Author)
  • T. Torralva - , Favaloro University, Diego Portales University (Author)
  • F. Manes - , National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Diego Portales University, Macquarie University (Author)
  • Agustín Ibanez - , Favaloro University, National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Diego Portales University, Universidad Autonoma Del Caribe, Macquarie University, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez (Author)

Abstract

Background: Moral judgment has been proposed to rely on a distributed brain network. This function is impaired in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), a condition involving damage to some regions of this network. However, no studies have investigated moral judgment in bvFTD via structural neuroimaging.
Methods: We compared the performance of 21 bvFTD patients and 19 controls on a moral judgment task involving scenarios that discriminate between the contributions of intentions and outcomes. Voxel-based morphometry was used to assess (a) the atrophy pattern in bvFTD patients, (b) associations between gray matter (GM) volume and moral judgments, and (c) structural differences between bvFTD subgroups (patients with relatively preserved moral judgment and patients with severer moral judgment impairments).
Results: Patients judged attempted harm as more permissible and accidental harm as less permissible than controls. The groups' performance on accidental harm was associated with GM volume in the precuneus. In controls, it was al- so associated with the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC). Also, both groups' performance on attempted harm was associated with GM volume in the temporoparietal junction. Patients exhibiting worse performance displayed smaller GM volumes in the precuneus and temporal pole.
Conclusions: Results suggest that moral judgment abnormalities in bvFTD are associated with impaired integration of intentions and outcomes, which depends on an extended brain network. In bvFTD, moral judgment seems to critically depend on areas beyond the VMPFC.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-217
JournalNeurodegenerative Diseases
Volume16
Issue number3-4
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Peer-reviewedYes
Externally publishedYes

External IDs

Scopus 84957927345

Keywords

Keywords

  • Moral judgment, behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia, magnetic resonance imaging, Voxel-based morphometry, structural correlates