Initial experience with CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapies compared to antihormone monotherapies in routine clinical use in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer — Data from the PRAEGNANT research network for the first 2 years of drug availability in Germany

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Andreas Schneeweiss - , Heidelberg University  (Author)
  • Johannes Ettl - , Technical University of Munich (Author)
  • Diana Lüftner - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Matthias W. Beckmann - , Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (Author)
  • Erik Belleville - , Clin-Sol GmbH (Author)
  • Peter A. Fasching - , Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (Author)
  • Tanja N. Fehm - , University Hospital Duesseldorf (Author)
  • Matthias Geberth - , Gynäkologische Praxisklinik am Rosengarten (Author)
  • Lothar Häberle - , Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (Author)
  • Peyman Hadji - , Frankfurt Center of Bone Health (Author)
  • Andreas D. Hartkopf - , University of Tübingen (Author)
  • Carsten Hielscher - , gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund (Author)
  • Jens Huober - , Ulm University (Author)
  • Eugen Ruckhäberle - , University Hospital Duesseldorf (Author)
  • Wolfgang Janni - , Ulm University (Author)
  • Hans Christian Kolberg - , Marienhospital Bottrop (Author)
  • Christian M. Kurbacher - , Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz (Author)
  • Evelyn Klein - , Technical University of Munich (Author)
  • Michael P. Lux - , Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (Author)
  • Volkmar Müller - , University of Hamburg (Author)
  • Naiba Nabieva - , Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (Author)
  • Friedrich Overkamp - , Oncologianova GmbH (Author)
  • Hans Tesch - , Agaplesion Markus Hospital Frankfurt (Author)
  • Elena Laakmann - , University of Hamburg (Author)
  • Florin Andrei Taran - , University of Tübingen (Author)
  • Julia Seitz - , Heidelberg University  (Author)
  • Christoph Thomssen - , Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (Author)
  • Michael Untch - , HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch (Author)
  • Pauline Wimberger - , Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Author)
  • Rachel Wuerstlein - , Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (Author)
  • Bernhard Volz - , Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (Author)
  • Diethelm Wallwiener - , University of Tübingen (Author)
  • Markus Wallwiener - , Heidelberg University  (Author)
  • Sara Y. Brucker - , University of Tübingen (Author)

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy (CDK4/6i + ET) is a standard for patients with advanced hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative (HR + HER2–) breast cancer (BC). However, real-world data on the implementation of therapy usage, efficacy, and toxicity have not yet been reported. Methods: The PRAEGNANT registry was used to identify advanced HR + HER2– BC patients (n = 1136). The use of chemotherapy, ET, everolimus + ET, and CDK4/6i + ET was analyzed for first-line, second-line, and third-line therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were also compared between patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET and ET monotherapy. Also toxicity was assessed. Results: CDK4/6i + ET use increased from 38.5% to 62.7% in the first 2 years after CDK4/6i treatment became available (November 2016). Chemotherapy and ET monotherapy use decreased from 2015 to 2018 from 42.2% to 27.2% and from 53% to 9.5%, respectively. In this early analysis no statistically significant differences were found comparing CDK4/6i + ET and ET monotherapy patients with regard to PFS and OS. Leukopenia was was seen in 11.3% of patients under CDK4/6i + ET and 0.5% under ET monotherapy. Conclusions: In clinical practice, CDK4/6i + ET has been rapidly implemented. A group of patients with a more unfavorable prognosis was possibly treated in the real-world setting than in the reported randomized clinical trials. The available data suggest that longer follow-up times and a larger sample size are required in order to identify differences in survival outcomes. Studies should be supported that investigate whether chemotherapy can be avoided or delayed in this patient population by using CDK4/6i + ET.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-95
Number of pages8
JournalBreast
Volume54
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 32956934

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

  • Abemaciclib, Advanced breast cancer, CDK4/6, Chemotherapy, Endocrine therapy, Metastatic, Palbociclib, Ribociclib