Inappropriate Therapy and Shock Rates Between the Subcutaneous and Transvenous Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator: A Secondary Analysis of the PRAETORIAN Trial
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
- Department of Cardiac Surgery (at Dresden Heart Centre)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC)
- Isala Hospital Zwolle
- St. Antonius Hospital
- German Center for Cardiovascular Disease (DZHK) Partner site Heidelberg/Mannheim
- Emory University
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- The Valley Health System
- FlevoHospital
- Heart Center Leipzig
- Radboud University Medical Center
- University College London
- Barts Health NHS Trust
- Na Homolce Hospital
- Maastricht University Medical Centre (UMC+)
- Dutch Network for Cardiovascular Research (WCN)
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)
- Catharina Hospital Eindhoven
- CorVita Science Foundation
- Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG)
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Tergooi Medical Center Blaricum
- Imperial College London
- University Hospital of Würzburg
- Righospitalet
- Medisch Spectrum Twente
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital
- Medical Centre Leeuwarden
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUMC)
- Mount Sinai Hospital NY
- Englewood Hospital and Medical Center
- Jena University Hospital
- Pritzker School of Medicine
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inappropriate therapy (IAT) is an undesirable side effect of implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Early studies with the subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) showed relatively high inappropriate shock (IAS) rates. The PRAETORIAN (Prospective Randomized Comparison of Subcutaneous and Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy) trial demonstrated that the S-ICD is noninferior to the transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) with regard to the combined end point of IAS and complications. This secondary analyses evaluates all IAT in the PRAETORIAN trial.
METHODS: This international, multicenter trial randomized 849 patients with an indication for ICD therapy between S-ICD (n=426) and TV-ICD therapy (n=423). ICD programming was mandated by protocol. All analysis were performed in the modified intention-to-treat population.
RESULTS: In both groups 42 patients experienced IAT (48-month Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidence, 9.9% and 10.1%, respectively; hazard ratio (HR), 0.99 [95% CI, 0.65-1.52]; P=0.97). There was no significant difference in patients experiencing IAS between both groups (P=0.14). In the S-ICD group, 81 IAT episodes with 124 IAS and 1 inappropriate antitachycardia pacing occurred versus 89 IAT episodes with 130 IAS and 124 inappropriate antitachycardia pacing in the TV-ICD group. IAT episodes were most frequently caused by supraventricular tachycardias in the TV-ICD group (n=83/89) versus cardiac oversensing in the S-ICD group (n=40/81). In the TV-ICD group, a baseline heart rate >80 bpm (HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.05-3.76]; P=0.03), a history of atrial fibrillation (HR, 2.66 [95% CI, 1.41-5.02]; P=0.003), and smoking (HR, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.31-4.09]; P=0.005) were independent predictors for IAT. A QRS duration >120 ms was an independent predictor for IAT caused by cardiac oversensing in the S-ICD group (HR, 3.13 [95% CI, 1.34-7.31]; P=0.008). Post-IAS interventions significantly reduced IAS recurrence in both groups (P=0.046).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in IAT and IAS rates between the S-ICD and TV-ICD in a conventional ICD population, but causes and predictors for IAT differed between the devices. After the first IAS, an intervention significantly reduced the recurrence rate of IAS.
REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01296022.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | e012836 |
Journal | Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 12 |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2024 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
Scopus | 85211125859 |
---|
Keywords
Keywords
- Humans, Defibrillators, Implantable, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Electric Countershock/instrumentation, Treatment Outcome, Risk Factors, Prospective Studies, Time Factors