Impact of natalizumab on quality of life in a real-world cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from MS PATHS
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimizing multiple sclerosis treatment warrants understanding of changes in physical, mental, and social health.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of natalizumab on Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) scores.
METHODS: Annualized change in T-scores and likelihood of ≥5-point improvement over baseline were calculated for each Neuro-QoL domain after natalizumab initiation. Comparisons with ocrelizumab-treated patients were conducted after propensity score weighting and adjustment for relevant co-medications, year, and drug-year interaction.
RESULTS: Among 164 natalizumab patients analyzed, 8 of 12 Neuro-QoL domains improved significantly, with greater improvement in patients with abnormal baseline Neuro-QoL. In the subgroup comparison of natalizumab-treated (n = 145) and ocrelizumab-treated (n = 520) patients, significant improvement occurred in 9 of 12 and 4 of 12 domains, respectively. The difference between groups was statistically significant for positive affect and well-being (p = 0.02), sleep (p = 0.003), and satisfaction with social roles and activities (SRA) (p = 0.03) in the overall population and for emotional and behavioral dyscontrol (p = 0.01), participation in SRA (p = 0.0001), and satisfaction with SRA (p = 0.02) in patients with abnormal baseline Neuro-QoL.
CONCLUSIONS: Natalizumab can produce clinically meaningful improvements in mental and social health. Such improvements are unlikely to be primarily driven by expectation bias, as their magnitude exceeded improvements with another high-efficacy therapy, ocrelizumab.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 20552173211004634 |
Journal | Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
PubMedCentral | PMC8053767 |
---|---|
Scopus | 85104475406 |
ORCID | /0000-0001-8799-8202/work/171553577 |