How risky is a second allogeneic stem cell transplantation?

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Olaf Penack - , European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (Author)
  • Mouad Abouqateb - , University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf (Author)
  • Christophe Peczynski - , University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf (Author)
  • William Boreland - , University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf (Author)
  • Nicolaus Kröger - , University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf (Author)
  • Robert Zeiser - , University Medical Center Freiburg (Author)
  • Fabio Ciceri - , IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele - Milano (Author)
  • Thomas Schroeder - , University Hospital Essen (Author)
  • Peter Dreger - , University Hospital Heidelberg (Author)
  • Jakob Passweg - , University Hospital Basel (Author)
  • Johannes Schetelig - , Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Matthias Stelljes - , University of Münster (Author)
  • Igor Wolfgang Blau - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Georg-Nikolaus Franke - , University Hospital Leipzig (Author)
  • Katarina Riesner - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Hélène Schoemans - , University Hospitals Leuven (Author)
  • Ivan Moiseev - , Pavlov First State Medical University of St. Petersburg (Author)
  • Zinaida Peric - , University Hospital Center Zagreb (Author)

Abstract

There is no consensus on second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) indications in patients with hematologic malignancies relapsing after a first alloSCT. In historic publications, a very high non-relapse mortality (NRM) has been described, arguing against performing a second alloSCT. We analysed the outcome of 3356 second alloSCTs performed 2011-21 following a hematologic malignancy relapse. Outcomes at two years after second alloSCT were: NRM 22%, relapse incidence 50%, overall survival 38%, and progression-free survival 28%. Key risk factors for increased NRM were: older age, low performance score, high disease-risk-index, early relapse after the first alloSCT, unrelated/haploidentical donor, and GVHD before second alloSCT. Any type of GVHD after first alloSCT was also important risk factor for acute GVHD and chronic GVHD after second alloSCT. There was a preferential use of a different donor (80%) at second alloSCT from first alloSCT. However, in multivariate analysis, the use of the same alloSCT donor for second alloSCT vs. a different donor was not associated with any of the survival or GVHD endpoints. We show considerably improved outcome as compared to historic reports. These current data support a wider use of second alloSCT and provide risk factors for NRM that need to be considered.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1799-1807
Number of pages9
JournalLeukemia
Volume38
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2024
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMedCentral PMC11286516
Scopus 85196827847

Keywords

Keywords

  • Humans, Female, Male, Adult, Graft vs Host Disease/etiology, Middle Aged, Transplantation, Homologous, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects, Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy, Young Adult, Adolescent, Aged, Risk Factors, Survival Rate, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology, Recurrence