Household or Individual as Unit of Analysis? Consequences of different interview selection strategies concerning travel behaviour, using the example of the survey “Mobilität in Städten – SrV” (Mobility in Cities – SrV)

Research output: Contribution to conferencesPaperContributedpeer-review

Abstract

Since the importance of transport analysis has been growing since the 1960s, interviewing households has become a proven means of gathering information concerning the travel behaviour of the population. In spite of the exploitation of various classical methods and the partial use of new media, the acceptance of household interviews in Germany has deteriorated sharply over the last few years. This can be seen in the continuously declining response rates. Usually, a low response rate has a negative impact on the quality of the data gathered and on the acceptance of the published results. The Technische Universität Dresden is currently analysing the possibility of halting the declining response rate by combining different survey methods that differ in regard to the target group. One of the key questions in considering a target-group-specific approach is the decision of whether to choose the household or the individual as the primary unit of analysis. Deciding on a favourable sampling strategy requires careful reflection on the advantages and disadvantages in terms of statistics, content and the practicability of the survey.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages13
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Peer-reviewedYes

Conference

Title9th International Conference on Transport Survey Methods
SubtitleScoping the Future While Staying on Track
Abbreviated titleISCTSC 2011
Conference number9
Duration13 - 18 November 2011
Degree of recognitionInternational event
CityTermas de Puyehue
CountryChile

External IDs

ORCID /0000-0001-7857-3077/work/141545192
ORCID /0000-0002-6028-6317/work/142237318

Keywords