Household or Individual as Unit of Analysis? Consequences of different interview selection strategies concerning travel behaviour, using the example of the survey “Mobilität in Städten – SrV” (Mobility in Cities – SrV)
Research output: Contribution to conferences › Paper › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
Since the importance of transport analysis has been growing since the 1960s, interviewing households has become a proven means of gathering information concerning the travel behaviour of the population. In spite of the exploitation of various classical methods and the partial use of new media, the acceptance of household interviews in Germany has deteriorated sharply over the last few years. This can be seen in the continuously declining response rates. Usually, a low response rate has a negative impact on the quality of the data gathered and on the acceptance of the published results. The Technische Universität Dresden is currently analysing the possibility of halting the declining response rate by combining different survey methods that differ in regard to the target group. One of the key questions in considering a target-group-specific approach is the decision of whether to choose the household or the individual as the primary unit of analysis. Deciding on a favourable sampling strategy requires careful reflection on the advantages and disadvantages in terms of statistics, content and the practicability of the survey.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 13 |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
Conference
Title | 9th International Conference on Transport Survey Methods |
---|---|
Subtitle | Scoping the Future While Staying on Track |
Abbreviated title | ISCTSC 2011 |
Conference number | 9 |
Duration | 13 - 18 November 2011 |
Degree of recognition | International event |
City | Termas de Puyehue |
Country | Chile |
External IDs
ORCID | /0000-0001-7857-3077/work/141545192 |
---|---|
ORCID | /0000-0002-6028-6317/work/142237318 |