ESMO basic requirements for AI-based biomarkers in oncology (EBAI)

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • M Aldea - , Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Author)
  • M Salto-Tellez - , Queen's University Belfast, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (Author)
  • A Marra - , IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - Milano, University of Milan (Author)
  • R Umeton - , St. Jude Children Research Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Weill Cornell Medicine, Harvard University (Author)
  • A Stenzinger - , Weill Cornell Medicine (Author)
  • M Koopman - , University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht (Author)
  • A Prelaj - , IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano, Polytechnic University of Milan (Author)
  • K L Kehl - , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Author)
  • S Gilbert - , Else Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital Health (Author)
  • M-E Leßmann - , Else Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital Health (Author)
  • J Lipkova - , University of California at Irvine, UCI Health Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (Author)
  • L Provenzano - , IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano, Polytechnic University of Milan (Author)
  • F Meric-Bernstam - , University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Author)
  • S Halabi - , Duke University (Author)
  • J Wu - , Duke University, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Author)
  • A Pellat - , Hospital Cochin (Author)
  • K P M Suijkerbuijk - , University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht (Author)
  • B Besse - , Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay (Author)
  • B Ryll - , Melanoma Patient Network Europe (Author)
  • C Marchió - , University of Turin, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS (Author)
  • M Crispin-Ortuzar - , University of Cambridge (Author)
  • R Fehrmann - , University of Groningen (Author)
  • J Vibert - , Institut Gustave Roussy (Author)
  • D Ferber - , National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg (Author)
  • C Pauli - , University of Zurich (Author)
  • A Valachis - , Örebro University (Author)
  • F Corso - , IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano (Author)
  • T J Brinker - , German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) (Author)
  • J Mateo - , Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (Author)
  • N Harbeck - , Complutense University (Author)
  • E C Winkler - , National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg (Author)
  • F Lopez-Rios - , Complutense University (Author)
  • R Perez-Lopez - , Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) (Author)
  • G Pentheroudakis - , European Society for Medical Oncology (Author)
  • S Delaloge - , Institut Gustave Roussy (Author)
  • C Benedikt Westphalen - , Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Munich (Author)
  • J N Kather - , Else Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital Health, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, University of Leeds (Author)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to introduce an increasing number of biomarkers in oncology. To bridge the gap between oncology and computer science, it is timely to define recommendations for AI-based biomarkers suitable for routine clinical use. Here, we propose the ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology) Basic Requirements for AI-based Biomarkers In Oncology (EBAI).

DESIGN: The EBAI framework was developed using a modified Delphi methodology, involving a multidisciplinary panel of 37 experts who participated in four structured consensus rounds.

RESULTS: AI-based biomarkers were classified as 'class A' (AI quantification of established biomarkers), 'class B' (indirect measure of known biomarkers using AI-based alternative methods, to be deployed as pre-screening tests), and 'class C' (novel AI-derived biomarkers, with C1 for prognosis and C2 for prediction of treatment effect). The EBAI framework addresses AI biomarkers for clinical use. Ground truth, performance, and generalisability were considered essential; fairness was recommended. Minimal validation requirements indicate that class A requires concordance studies, class B analytical validation, class C1 high-quality retrospective real-world or clinical trial data, and class C2 additionally requires clinical validation in prospective clinical trials for the prediction of response to a new treatment. All biomarker studies should report multiple evaluation and calibration metrics, with a clearly defined primary objective. Generalisability should be demonstrated across all intended use settings, including variability in data acquisition, post-processing, and population characteristics. Biomarkers must not be applied to other cancer types or modalities without supporting evidence.

CONCLUSIONS: EBAI defines criteria for AI-based biomarker adoption in routine use, providing a common language for physicians, AI developers, and researchers.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)414-430
Number of pages17
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume37
Issue number3
Early online date18 Nov 2025
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2026
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

ORCID /0000-0002-3730-5348/work/201625048
ORCID /0000-0002-1997-1689/work/201625057
ORCID /0009-0005-7029-0028/work/201625158
Mendeley ffcc9006-7988-3a71-9714-ceb17a7f3a2b
Scopus 105030165164

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • Artificial Intelligence/standards, Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis, Delphi Technique, Europe, Humans, Medical Oncology/methods, Neoplasms/diagnosis, Prognosis, Societies, Medical, EBAI, scale, biomarker, artificial intelligence, cancer, validation