Einsatz und Nutzen von Gesundheits-Apps in chirurgischen Disziplinen – ein Delphi-Experten-Konsensus

Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review

Contributors

  • C. Groeben - , University of Marburg (Author)
  • P. Karschuck - , Heidelberg University  (Author)
  • F. Kormann - , University of Marburg (Author)
  • M. Baunacke - , Department of Urology (Author)
  • L. Wiemer - , Kranus Health GmbH, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • H. Krause - , Heidelberg University  (Author)
  • K. Fuchs - , University of Würzburg (Author)
  • A. Wiedemann - , Witten/Herdecke University (Author)
  • A. A. Schnitzbauer - , Ruhr University Bochum (Author)
  • A. Schmitz - , Bayer AG (Author)
  • D. Ebert - , Technical University of Munich (Author)
  • J. P. Struck - , University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel (Author)
  • H. Borgmann - , University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel (Author)

Abstract

Background: Healthcare apps or healthcare applications (DiHA) offer great potential for the modernization of healthcare treatment but place high demands on the digital health landscape. In order to achieve a real additional value for the treatment of patients, clear criteria must be fulfilled. This article is based on a consensus conference of the Digital Health Summit (29–30 August 2024) at the Technical University Brandenburg. Material and method: A modified multistage Delphi survey procedure was carried out with interdisciplinary experts from clinical, scientific and industrial sectors to achieve a consensus on the requirements for surgical healthcare apps. Results: The Delphi procedure led to 30 statements on requirements for surgical apps in Germany. They can provide evidence-based benefits for patient information and reduction of symptoms but must be more stringently tested in clinical studies on benefits and safety. In addition, apps can support training, simplify documentation and organize processes more efficiently. Uniform quality criteria are necessary in the European context. Patient data should be anonymized to assist research, whereby the sovereignty of the data lies by the patients. Regulatory hurdles should be dismantled and DiHAs should be classified according to the evidence and the risk-benefit profile. Conclusion: In our statements we recommend to actively promote the development and use of healthcare apps to improve the treatment of patients in surgery. This requires targeted support for licensing, research and use, particularly by academic groups, as well as studies on the efficacy of healthcare apps.

Translated title of the contribution
Implementation and benefits of healthcare apps in surgical disciplines—A Delphi expert consensus

Details

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)132–142
Number of pages11
JournalDie Chirurgie : Zeitschrift für alle Gebiete der operativen Medizin
Volume97
Issue number2
Early online dateJul 2025
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2026
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 40643682

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery - Delphi procedure, Digital health application (DiGA), Patient support, Surgery, Urology

Keywords

  • Delphi procedure, Digital health application (DiGA), Patient support, Surgery, Urology