Effects of varying diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder are endorsing the concept of partial PTSD
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the appropriateness of different diagnostic criteria sets for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This was done by varying diagnostic criteria on the diagnosis of PTSD in a study group of N = 146 former political prisoners, and comparing the resulting diagnostic groups with a study group of N = 75 nontraumatized controls with regard to mean scores on measures of subjective distress (i.e., IES-R, BDI, BAI, SCL-90-R). The findings did not support the diagnostic boundaries as defined by the DSM-IV or the lowering of the avoidance criterion from three to two symptoms. The concept of partial PTSD appeared to be the most appropriate way to provide diagnostic coverage for those who did not meet full DSM IV criteria.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 155-165 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of traumatic stress |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 1999 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
PubMed | 10027149 |
---|
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Keywords
- Partial posttraumatic stress disorder, Posttraumatic stress disorder