Effects of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Agonist Pioglitazone on Peripheral Vessel Function and Clinical Parameters in Nondiabetic Patients: A Double-Center, Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Marian Christoph - , TUD Dresden University of Technology (Author)
  • Joerg Herold - , Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg (Author)
  • Anna Berg-Holldack - , TUD Dresden University of Technology (Author)
  • Thomas Rauwolf - , Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg (Author)
  • Tjalf Ziemssen - , Department of Neurology (Author)
  • Alexander Schmeisser - , Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg (Author)
  • Sönke Weinert - , Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg (Author)
  • Bernd Ebner - , TUD Dresden University of Technology (Author)
  • Karim Ibrahim - , TUD Dresden University of Technology (Author)
  • Ruth H. Strasser - , TUD Dresden University of Technology (Author)
  • Ruediger C. Braun-Dullaeus - , Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg (Author)

Abstract

Objective: Despite the advanced therapy with statins, antithrombotics, and antihypertensive agents, the medical treatment of atherosclerotic disease is less than optimal. Therefore, additional therapeutic antiatherosclerotic options are desirable. This pilot study was performed to assess the potential antiatherogenic effect of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist pioglitazone in nondiabetic patients. Methods: A total of 54 nondiabetic patients were observed in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized to pioglitazone or placebo. The following efficacy parameters were determined by serial analyses: artery pulse wave analysis and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), static and dynamic retinal vessel function, and the common carotid intima-media thickness (IMT). The main secondary endpoint was the change in different biochemical markers. Results: After 9 months, no relevant differences could be determined in the two treatment groups in PWV (pioglitazone 14.3 ± 4.4 m/s vs. placebo 14.2 ± 4.2 m/s), retinal arterial diameter (pioglitazone 112.1 ± 23.3 μm vs. placebo 117.9 ± 21.5 μm) or IMT (pioglitazone 0.85 ± 0.30 mm vs. placebo 0.79 ± 0.15 mm). Additionally, there were no differences in the change in biochemical markers like cholesteryl ester transfer protein, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein or white blood cell count. Conclusions: Treatment with a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist in nondiabetic patients did not improve the function of large and small peripheral vessels (PPP Trial, clinicaltrialsregister.eu: 2006-000186-11).

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-171
Number of pages7
JournalCardiology : international journal of cardiovascular medicine, surgery and pathology
Volume131
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jul 2015
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 25967848

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular disease, Intima-media thickness, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist, Pioglitazone, Pulse wave analysis, Retinal vessel function