Disentangling effects of multiple agricultural stressors on benthic and hyporheic nitrate uptake

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Julia Pasqualini - , Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (Author)
  • Daniel Graeber - , Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (Author)
  • Alexander Bartusch - , Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (Author)
  • Steffen Kümmel - , Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (Author)
  • Zulma Lorena Duran Hernandez - , Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Aarhus University (Author)
  • Niculina Musat - , Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (Author)
  • Nergui Sunjidmaa - , Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (Author)
  • Markus Weitere - , Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (Author)
  • Mario Brauns - , Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (Author)

Abstract

Agricultural land use alters nitrate (NO3) uptake dynamics in streams, but the specific mechanisms linking individual agricultural stressors to benthic and hyporheic uptake remain unclear. Using stream-side mesocosms and 15N-nitrate additions, we examined the individual and combined effects of fine sediment (FS) and augmented light and phosphorus levels (L&P) on benthic and hyporheic NO3 uptake rates. In absence of FS, L&P stimulated uptake of autotrophic and heterotrophic biofilms, leading to a 12- and 7-fold increase in the benthic and hyporheic compartments, respectively. Under ambient light and nutrient conditions, FS reduced by 3-fold benthic uptake, but effects were not significant. Conversely, in the hyporheic compartment, FS induced anoxic conditions, likely stimulating denitrification and causing a 14-fold increase in hyporheic uptake. When these stressors were combined, they did not interact in the benthic compartment. Conversely, in the hyporheic compartment they interacted antagonistically, with L&P diminishing the increase in uptake induced by FS. Our results indicate that the previously observed increase of whole-stream NO3 uptake in agricultural streams is attributable to nutrients and light stimulating benthic uptake, while fine sediment effects and the role of the hyporheic compartment to total uptake are modest. Moreover, the finding that stressor interactions vary with ecosystem compartments calls for a consideration of all compartments and their contribution to whole-system functioning in multiple stressor studies. We are beginning to understand how multiple interacting stressors affect stream functioning, but more mechanistic evidence is needed to disentangle whether additive or non-additive effects prevail in human-altered ecosystems.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-299
Number of pages13
JournalBiogeochemistry
Volume167
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024
Peer-reviewedYes
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • Additive effect, Antagonism, Fine sediment, Interaction, Light and phosphorous