Different Treatment Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis Patients Receiving Ocrelizumab or Ofatumumab

Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review

Contributors

  • Sven G Meuth - , University Hospital Duesseldorf (Author)
  • Stephanie Wolff - , University Hospital Gießen and Marburg (Author)
  • Anna Mück - , University Hospital Gießen and Marburg (Author)
  • Alice Willison - , University Hospital Duesseldorf (Author)
  • Konstanze Kleinschnitz - , University Hospital Essen (Author)
  • Saskia Räuber - , University Hospital Duesseldorf (Author)
  • Marc Pawlitzki - , University Hospital Duesseldorf (Author)
  • Franz Felix Konen - , Hannover Medical School (MHH) (Author)
  • Thomas Skripuletz - , Hannover Medical School (MHH) (Author)
  • Matthias Grothe - , Greifswald University Hospital (Author)
  • Tobias Ruck - , University Hospital Duesseldorf (Author)
  • Hagen B Huttner - , University Hospital Gießen and Marburg (Author)
  • Christoph Kleinschnitz - , University Hospital Essen (Author)
  • Tobias Bopp - , University Medical Center Mainz (Author)
  • Refik Pul - , University Hospital Essen (Author)
  • Bruce A C Cree - , UCSF Weill Institute for Neuroscience (Author)
  • Hans-Peter Hartung - , University Hospital Duesseldorf (Author)
  • Kathrin Möllenhoff - , Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (Author)
  • Steffen Pfeuffer - , University Hospital Gießen and Marburg (Author)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: B-cell-depletion via CD20 antibodies is a safe and effective treatment for active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Both ocrelizumab (OCR) and ofatumumab (OFA) have demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials and are approved for treatment of RMS, yet nothing is known on their comparative effectiveness, especially in the real-world setting.

METHODS: This prospective cohort study includes patients that were started on either OCR or OFA between September 2021 and December 2023. Patients were followed until June 2024 and recruited at 3 large tertiary centers in Germany (Duesseldorf, Essen, and Giessen). Propensity-score-matching was used to address baseline imbalances among patients. Clinical relapses, presence of new or enlarging MRI lesions and 6-month confirmed disability worsening were evaluated. Non-inferiority of OFA compared to OCR was evaluated through comparison of Kaplan-Meier-estimates.

RESULTS: A total of 1,138 patients were initially enrolled in the cohort. Following patient selection and propensity-score-matching, 544 OCR and 417 OFA patients were included in the final analysis. In our primary analysis, OFA was non-inferior to OCR in terms of relapses, disability progression, and accrual of MRI lesions. Subgroup analyses confirmed findings in previously naïve and platform-treated patients. Potential differences between OFA and OCR were seen in patients switching from S1P receptor modulators or natalizumab.

CONCLUSION: We here provide comparative data on the effectiveness of OCR and OFA in patients with active RMS. OFA was non-inferior to OCR in the overall cohort. Potential differences observed in patients switching from S1P receptor modulators or natalizumab require further validation. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:583-595.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)583-595
Number of pages13
JournalAnnals of neurology
Volume97
Issue number3
Early online date25 Nov 2024
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025
Peer-reviewedYes
Externally publishedYes

External IDs

PubMedCentral PMC11831887
Scopus 85210040362

Keywords

Keywords

  • Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use, Cohort Studies, Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use, Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome