Development of a two-tier instrument on simple electric circuits

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Lana Ivanjek - , Junior Professorship in Didactics of Physics (Author)
  • Louisa Morris - (Author)
  • Thomas Schubatzky - (Author)
  • Martin Hopf - (Author)
  • Jan-Philipp Burde - (Author)
  • Claudia Haagen-Schützenhöfer - (Author)
  • Liza Dopatka - (Author)
  • Verena Spatz - (Author)
  • Thomas Wilhelm - (Author)

Abstract

This article reports the development of a two-tier simple electric circuits test (2T-SEC Test). Simple electric circuits are introduced to students early in their school years and are an important part of the physics curriculum all the way to the university level. However, many students do not develop an adequate conceptual understanding of simple electric circuits and especially of electrical voltage. For this reason, six physics education research groups from Germany and Austria started a large study to evaluate and improve middle-school students’ conceptual understanding of simple electric circuits. As a first step, we developed the test instrument presented in this article. First, nine semistructured interviews were conducted with middle-school students in Austria. The interviews were transcribed, analyzed and (common) student difficulties with simple electric circuits were identified. Second, based on the results from the interviews and previous research on this topic, an instrument consisting of 25 two-tier multiple-choice items was developed and administered to
N
=
1
5
6
8
middle-school students in Austria and Germany. Third, the data were evaluated using Rasch analysis. The item reliability of the test was 0.99, while the person reliability of paired scoring was 0.62 and the reliability of separate scoring was 0.75. The average difficulties of the main concepts regarding simple electric circuits (open and closed circuits, electric current, resistance, series and parallel circuits, and electrical voltage) were calculated and compared. The analysis suggests that the concept of voltage is most difficult for students while distinguishing between open and closed circuits is the easiest.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number020123
JournalPhysical Review Physics Education Research
Volume17
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 24 Sept 2021
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85115974179

Keywords

Library keywords