CT versus MR guidance for radiofrequency ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a 10-year follow-up favors MR guidance
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the results of CT- vs MR-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer after 10 years of follow-up in an observational, retrospective, and multicentric study. Methods: A total of 238 patients with 496 LM were treated with RFA either with CT (CT group) or magnetic resonance (MR group) guidance. Every ablated LM was assessed and followed up with diagnostic MRI. Technical success, technique efficacy, predictive factors, recurrence rates, and overall survival were assessed. Results: The CT group comprised 143 patients and the MR group 77 patients. Eighteen patients underwent ablation with both modalities. Technical success per patient and per lesion was 88% and 93% for CT and 87% and 89.6% for MR, and technique efficacy was 97.1% and 98.6% for CT and 98.7% and 99.3% for MR respectively. Local recurrence following the first ablation (primary patency) occurred in 20.1% (CT) vs 4.6% (MR) (p < 0.001). Residual liver tumor, size of LM, and advanced N and M stage at initial diagnosis were independent predictors for overall survival in both groups. The median overall survival measured from first RFA treatment was 2.6 years. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival were 85.9%, 25.5%, and 19.1% respectively. Conclusions: The MR group had significantly better local control compared to the CT group. There was no significant difference in patient survival between the two groups. Clinical relevance statement: MR-guided radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases is safe and effective, and offers better local control than CT-guided ablation. Key Points: • Imaging modality for radiofrequency ablation guidance is an independent predictor of local recurrence in colorectal liver metastases. • MR-guided radiofrequency ablation achieved better local control of liver metastases from colorectal cancer than CT-guided. • The number and size of liver metastases are, among others, independent predictors of survival. Radiofrequency ablation with MR guidance improved clinical outcome but does not affect survival.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 4663-4671 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | European radiology |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 7 |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2024 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
PubMed | 38041717 |
---|
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Keywords
- Colorectal liver metastases, Magnetic resonance imaging, Multidetector computed tomography, Radiofrequency ablation