The authors regret that an error was happened in Figure 4a (XRD spectra) of the article due to a technical oversight in data processing. Sample MSG450 was inadvertently plotted twice, with one instance mislabelled as “MGs.” This occurred because of an unintentional software misuse during plotting. It is confirmed that the error does not impact the study's scientific conclusions, as the duplicated data originated from the same valid sample. The corrected figure has been verified and is shown as following:[Figure presented] Fig. 4. (a) XRD patterns of MGs, MSG50, MSG250, MSG450 measured at a scan rate of 2°/min. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.