The authors regret an unfortunate mistake in Fig. 9 of the original version of the article, caused by a mislabeling of original fluorescence microscopy images, which resulted in the use of incorrect images for the conditions “C1 −80 °C day 3” and “C1 −80 °C day 14” when assembling the fluorescence images on the panel to produce the said Fig. 9. After a thorough revision of the acquired fluorescence microscopy images taking into consideration the equivalent records, the labeling has been revised. The correct images corresponding to the two referred conditions were identified and have now been placed in the due positions in the panel corresponding to Fig. 9, as follows. We would like to emphasize that this error does not affect the interpretation or discussion of the obtained results, neither the drawn conclusions indicated in the article. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.[Formula