Nasal airflow obstruction correlates with several ailments, such as higher patency, increased friction at the mucosal wall or the so-called Little's area, improper air conditioning, and snoring. Nasal dilators are frequently employed, mainly due to their ease of access and use, combined with their non-permanent and non-surgical nature. Their overall efficacy, however, has not been clearly demonstrated so far, with some studies reporting conflicting outcomes, mainly because being based on subjective evaluations. This study employs Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations to analyze the flow inside a real nose, performs an objective assessment of a nasal dilator's effect in terms of airflow and air conditioning, reporting flow paths, friction levels, heat and water fluxes and detailed temperature and humidity distributions. Coincidentally, the studied nose presents a septal deviation, with one nostril being wider than the other. The tubes of the dilator used in both nostrils are identical, as with any standard commercial dilator. Consequently, the dilator widens one nostril, as intended, but results in an obstruction in the other. This allows simultaneously addressing two situations, the nominal function of the dilator, as well as an off-design case. Results indicate a 24 % increase in nasal patency in the design situation. The effect, however, is limited, as quantified by appropriate measures, such as the flow-generated friction at the nose surfaces and the temperature fluxes. Hence, the effect of such a dilator in nominal conditions is perhaps not as large as might be hoped. In the off-design situation, nasal resistance increases by 62 %, an undesirable effect, illustrating the consequences of using an inappropriate dilator.