Comparison of time to clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life in neurological disorders in patients treated with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
Aim: To assess time to improvement in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) domains for patients treated with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab. Methods: Patients enrolled in the MS PATHS network who initiated treatment with either natalizumab or ocrelizumab rated the Neuro-QoL domains of physical function, symptoms, emotional health, cognitive function and social ability. Results: Time to clinically meaningful improvement was significantly shorter with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab for cognitive function (event time ratio [95% CI]: 0.37 [0.24-0.57]; p < 0.001), sleep disturbance (0.45 [0.28-0.72]; p = 0.001), social role participation (0.37 [0.21-0.66]; p = 0.001) and social role satisfaction (0.5 [0.31-0.8]; p = 0.004). Conclusion: Natalizumab had shorter time to clinically meaningful improvement in cognitive, sleep, and social role Neuro-QoL domains versus ocrelizumab.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 21-33 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Neurodegenerative disease management |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 16 Apr 2024 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
unpaywall | 10.2217/nmt-2023-0047 |
---|---|
Mendeley | cf97f4dd-3211-320f-8b09-685609515ab3 |
Scopus | 85193411372 |
ORCID | /0000-0001-8799-8202/work/171553660 |