Comparison of self-reported alcohol consumption and ethyl glucuronide in hair in a sample of 60+ year -olds treated for DSM-5 alcohol use disorder

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Dorthe Grüner Nielsen - , University of Southern Denmark (Author)
  • Kjeld Andersen - , University of Southern Denmark (Author)
  • Anette Søgaard Nielsen - , University of Southern Denmark (Author)
  • Flemming Nielsen - , University of Southern Denmark (Author)
  • Silke Behrendt - , University of Southern Denmark (Author)
  • Randi Bilberg - , University of Southern Denmark (Author)
  • Michael Bogenschutz - , The Child Study Center at NYU Langone Medical Center, University of New Mexico (Author)
  • Gerhard Bühringer - , Professor (rtd.) for Addiction Research, University of Southern Denmark, Therapy Research Institute (Institut für Therapieforschung) (Author)
  • Angelina Isabella Mellentin - , University of Southern Denmark (Author)

Abstract

There is a lack of evidence for the consistency between self-reported alcohol consumption (SRAC) and concentrations of ethyl glucuronide in hair (hEtG) among elderly patients treated exclusively for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Hence, this study assessed the consistency between these two measures in these patients. A total of 190 patients with AUD were assessed for SRAC using Form 90 and hEtG, 14 or 22 weeks after treatment conclusion. Patients were grouped according to SRAC (g/day) and corresponding hEtG concentrations (pg/mg): 0 and textless5 (abstinence), 0.1–14.3 and 5.0–9.9 (low consumption), 14.4–21.4 and 10.0–15.9 (moderate consumption), 21.5–59.9 and 16.0–30 (high consumption) and ≥60 and textgreater30 (excessive consumption). The extent of underreporting and overreporting was examined by crosstabulations, and inter-rater reliability was reported by kappa correlations. Associations and effect modification were examined by conditional logistic regression. Due to multitesting, p-values ≤0.01 were considered significant. Underreporting was found in 96 patients (50.5 and overreporting in 41 patients (21.6. The kappa coefficients varied between 0.19 and 0.34. HEtG was more likely to detect low, moderate and high alcohol consumption compared with SRAC (ORs between 5.1 and 12.6, all p-values textless0.01), but SRAC and hEtG did not differ significantly with respect to identification of abstinence (OR = 1.9, p = 0.05). Inconsistency between the outcome measures was found in a considerable number of the patients. More studies examining the consistency between SRAC and specific direct biomarkers of alcohol in this population seem warranted.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13231
JournalAddiction biology
Volume27
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2022
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85141157434
PubMed 36301220

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Library keywords