Comparison of different degrees of variability in tidal volume to prevent deterioration of respiratory system elastance in experimental acute lung inflammation

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • T Kiss - , Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus (Joint first author)
  • P L Silva - , Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (Joint first author)
  • R Huhle - , Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Joint first author)
  • L Moraes - , Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (Author)
  • R S Santos - , Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (Author)
  • N S Felix - , Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (Author)
  • C L Santos - , Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (Author)
  • M M Morales - , Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (Author)
  • V L Capelozzi - , Federal University of São Paulo (Author)
  • M Kasper - , Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus (Author)
  • P Pelosi - , University of Genoa (Author)
  • Marcelo Gama de Abreu - , Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus (Author)
  • P R M Rocco - , Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (Author)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Variable ventilation improves respiratory function, but it is not known whether the amount of variability in tidal volume (VT) can be reduced in recruited lungs without a deterioration of respiratory system elastance.

METHODS: Acute lung inflammation was induced by intratracheal instillation of lipopolysaccharide in 35 Wistar rats. Twenty-eight animals were anaesthetized and ventilated in volume-controlled mode. Lungs were recruited by random variation of VT (mean 6 ml kg(-1), coefficient of variation 30%, normal distribution) for 30 min. Animals were randomly assigned to different amounts of VT variability (n=7 for 90 min per group): 30, 15, 7.5, or 0%. Lung function, diffuse alveolar damage, and gene expression of biological markers associated with cell mechanical stress, inflammation, and fibrogenesis were assessed. Seven animals were not ventilated and served as controls for post-mortem analyses.

RESULTS: A VT variability of 30%, but not 15, 7.5, or 0%, prevented deterioration of respiratory system elastance [Mean (SD) -7.5 (8.7%), P<0.05; 21.1 (9.6%), P<0.05; 43.3 (25.9), P<0.05; and 41.2 (16.4), P<0.05, respectively]. Diffuse alveolar damage was lower with a VT variability of 30% than with 0% and without ventilation, because of reduced oedema and haemorrhage. A VT variability of 30, 15, or 7.5% reduced the gene expression of amphiregulin, cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1, and tumour necrosis factor α compared with a VT variability of 0%.

CONCLUSIONS: In this model of acute lung inflammation, a VT variability of 30%, compared with 15 and 7.5%, was necessary to avoid deterioration of respiratory system elastance and was not associated with lung histological damage.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)708-715
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume116
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - May 2016
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 84965179594
researchoutputwizard legacy.publication#71818
PubMed 27106975
ORCID /0000-0003-2185-1819/work/147142871

Keywords

Keywords

  • Acute Disease, Animals, Carbon Dioxide/blood, Lipopolysaccharides, Male, Partial Pressure, Pneumonia/physiopathology, Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods, Pulmonary Gas Exchange/physiology, Rats, Wistar, Respiratory Mechanics, Tidal Volume/physiology