Comparison of different definitions of field strength used in reverberation chamber standards

Research output: Contribution to book/conference proceedings/anthology/reportConference contributionContributedpeer-review

Contributors

Abstract

In different standards involving reverberation chambers, the field strength is defined either using the magnitude of the vector (total) electric field, or the magnitude of a Cartesian (rectilinear) field component. We compare these methods for determining the maximum field strength. The ratio of the maximum of the total field to the maximum of a Cartesian component is a random variable whose probability distribution and statistics are derived and investigated. The mean value of this ratio is compared with the ratio of the respective mean values. Its standard deviation enables the estimation of confidence levels when comparing or converting between single measurements of the maximum total and maximum rectangular field. Theoretical results are illustrated and compared with measured results obtained in four different reverberation chambers.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, EMC 2007
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Peer-reviewedYes

Publication series

Series2007 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)
ISSN2158-110X

Conference

TitleIEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, EMC 2007
Duration9 - 13 July 2007
CityHonolulu, HI
CountryUnited States of America

External IDs

ORCID /0000-0002-3894-9831/work/142252663

Keywords

Keywords

  • EMC susceptibility, HIRF, Immunity, Maximum field strength, Pass/fail limits, Reverberation chamber