Comparison of ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure values in athletes according to foot posture index

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Hülya Kalender - (Author)
  • Kubilay Uzuner - (Author)
  • Deniz Şimşek - (Author)
  • İsmail Bayram - , University of Stuttgart (Author)

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to compare ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure distribution of athletes according to foot posture index (FPI). Patients and methods: Between September 2016 and May 2018, a total of 70 volunteer male athletes (mean age: 21.1±2.3 years; range, 18 to 25 years) were included. The athletes were divided into three groups according to their FPI as follows: having supinated feet (Group 1, n=16), neutral/normal feet (Group 2, n=36), or pronated feet (Group 3, n=18). Ankle range of motion (ROM), muscle flexibility, ankle joint strength, and plantar pressure distribution were measured. Results: There were significant differences among the three groups in both right and left ankle dorsiflexion ROM (p=0.009 and p=0.003, respectively). Group 1 had significantly smaller dorsiflexion ROM than the other groups. Group 1 also showed significantly less flexibility in the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles than the other foot posture groups. Groups 2 and 3 exhibited significant differences in the maximum torque (p=0.018), maximum work (p=0.008), and total work (p=0.008) of the right plantar flexor muscles at 60°/sec angular velocity. Peak pressure measurements of the right foot were higher in Group 1, compared to Groups 2 and 3 (p<0.001). Conclusion: The results of this study may help to enhance athletic performance by providing a guide for designing training programs appropriate for athletes with different foot types to address their specific muscle flexibility and strength deficiencies.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-99
JournalTurkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume68
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2022
Peer-reviewedYes
Externally publishedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85128252585

Keywords

Library keywords