Collaborative Processes in the Development of the International Competences for Undergraduate Psychology (ICUP) Model

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Jacquelyn Cranney - , University of New South Wales (Author)
  • Susan A. Nolan - , Seton Hall University (Author)
  • Remo Job - , University of Trento (Author)
  • Sonja Goedeke - , Auckland University of Technology (Author)
  • Michael A. Machin - , University of Southern Queensland (Author)
  • Judith Gullifer - , Monash University (Author)
  • Susanne Narciss - , Chair of Psychology of Learning and Instruction (Author)
  • Luciana Karine de Souza - , Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (Author)
  • Fanli Jia - , Seton Hall University (Author)
  • Lori Foster - , North Carolina State University (Author)
  • Julie A. Hulme - , Nottingham Trent University (Author)
  • Dragos Iliescu - , University of Bucharest (Author)
  • Xing-Da Ju - , Northeast Normal University (Author)
  • Haruyuki Kojima - , Kanazawa University (Author)
  • Aneesh Kumar - , Christ University, Bangalore (Author)
  • Therese M. S. Tchombe - , Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (Author)
  • Waikaremoana Waitoki - , University of Waikato (Author)
  • Marc Eric S. Reyes - , University of Santo Tomas (Author)
  • Veronica Boeta Madera - , Marist University of Mérida (Author)

Abstract

Across all nations, undergraduate psychology programmes aim to promote the acquisition of foundational psychology competences. Yet, until recently, a universally recognised model outlining essential competences did not exist. The International Collaboration on Undergraduate Psychology Outcomes (ICUPO) addressed this gap by developing the International Competences for Undergraduate Psychology (ICUP) Model. The aim of this article is to provide guidance about how other groups might successfully approach similar efforts to delineate discipline-specific key competences. We describe the processes that led to the development of the ICUP Model, framed by group development theory (Preparing, Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing Stages), with additional consideration of individual ICUPO Committee member psychological needs for competence, relatedness, and autonomy. Each group development Stage section (a) describes project activities relevant to the characteristics of that Stage, and (b) lists key strategies employed and lessons learned, as well as commentary on psychological needs. To further enhance the value of this endeavour, the Discussion includes (a) commentary on the strengths and limitations of these theories for understanding and enhancing the effectiveness of such project processes, and (b) actionable insights for educational leaders undertaking similar projects.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70061
Number of pages11
JournalInternational journal of psychology
Volume60
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2025
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 40491206
Scopus 105008301564
ORCID /0000-0002-4280-6534/work/204616272

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

  • Basic psychological needs, Competence model, Group development theory, International collaboration, International foundational psychology competence, Undergraduate psychology outcomes, undergraduate psychology outcomes, group development theory, international foundational psychology competence, competence model, basic psychological needs, international collaboration