Clinical Olfactory Working Group consensus statement on the treatment of postinfectious olfactory dysfunction

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Alfred B Addison - , East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (Author)
  • Billy Wong - , East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (Author)
  • Tanzime Ahmed - , East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (Author)
  • Alberto Macchi - , University of Insubria (Author)
  • Iordanis Konstantinidis - , Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (Author)
  • Caroline Huart - , Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (Author)
  • Johannes Frasnelli - , German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) (Author)
  • Alexander W Fjaeldstad - , Aarhus University (Author)
  • Vijay R Ramakrishnan - , University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (Author)
  • Philippe Rombaux - , Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (Author)
  • Katherine L Whitcroft - , RAS - Institute of Philosophy (Author)
  • Eric H Holbrook - , Harvard Medical School (HMS) (Author)
  • Sophia C Poletti - , University of Bern (Author)
  • Julien W Hsieh - , Geneva University Hospitals (Author)
  • Basile N Landis - , Geneva University Hospitals (Author)
  • James Boardman - , SmellTaste (Author)
  • Antje Welge-Lüssen - , University of Basel (Author)
  • Devina Maru - , Royal College of General Practitioners (Author)
  • Thomas Hummel - , Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Author)
  • Carl M Philpott - , University of East Anglia (Author)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract viruses are the second most common cause of olfactory dysfunction. As we learn more about the effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), with the recognition that olfactory dysfunction is a key symptom of this disease process, there is a greater need than ever for evidence-based management of postinfectious olfactory dysfunction (PIOD).

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to provide an evidence-based practical guide to the management of PIOD (including post-coronavirus 2019 cases) for both primary care practitioners and hospital specialists.

METHODS: A systematic review of the treatment options available for the management of PIOD was performed. The written systematic review was then circulated among the members of the Clinical Olfactory Working Group for their perusal before roundtable expert discussion of the treatment options. The group also undertook a survey to determine their current clinical practice with regard to treatment of PIOD.

RESULTS: The search resulted in 467 citations, of which 107 articles were fully reviewed and analyzed for eligibility; 40 citations fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 11 of which were randomized controlled trials. In total, 15 of the articles specifically looked at PIOD whereas the other 25 included other etiologies for olfactory dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS: The Clinical Olfactory Working Group members made an overwhelming recommendation for olfactory training; none recommended monocycline antibiotics. The diagnostic role of oral steroids was discussed; some group members were in favor of vitamin A drops. Further research is needed to confirm the place of other therapeutic options.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1704-1719
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume147
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - May 2021
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

Scopus 85101098075
ORCID /0000-0001-9713-0183/work/146645306

Keywords

Keywords

  • COVID-19/complications, Consensus, Evidence-Based Medicine, Olfaction Disorders/drug therapy, Practice Guidelines as Topic, SARS-CoV-2/immunology, Steroids/therapeutic use, Vitamin A/therapeutic use

Library keywords