Association of the OPRM1 A118G polymorphism and Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer: Clinical relevance for alcohol dependence

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Miriam Sebold - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Maria Garbusow - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Deniz Cerci - , Klinik für Forensische Psychiatrie (Author)
  • Ke Chen - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Christian Sommer - , Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Biotechnology Center (BIOTEC) (Author)
  • Quentin Jm Huys - , University College London (Author)
  • Stephan Nebe - , Faculty of Psychology, Mongolian University of Life Sciences, University of Zurich (Author)
  • Michael Rapp - , University of Potsdam (Author)
  • Ilya M Veer - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Ulrich S Zimmermann - , Biotechnology Center (BIOTEC) (Author)
  • Michael N Smolka - , Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, Biotechnology Center (BIOTEC) (Author)
  • Henrik Walter - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)
  • Andreas Heinz - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin (Author)
  • Eva Friedel - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Author)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) quantifies the extent to which a stimulus that has been associated with reward or punishment alters operant behaviour. In alcohol dependence (AD), the PIT effect serves as a paradigmatic model of cue-induced relapse. Preclinical studies have suggested a critical role of the opioid system in modulating Pavlovian-instrumental interactions. The A118G polymorphism of the OPRM1 gene affects opioid receptor availability and function. Furthermore, this polymorphism interacts with cue-induced approach behaviour and is a potential biomarker for pharmacological treatment response in AD. In this study, we tested whether the OPRM1 polymorphism is associated with the PIT effect and relapse in AD.

METHODS: Using a PIT task, we examined three independent samples: young healthy subjects (N = 161), detoxified alcohol-dependent patients (N = 186) and age-matched healthy controls (N = 105). We used data from a larger study designed to assess the role of learning mechanisms in the development and maintenance of AD. Subjects were genotyped for the A118G (rs1799971) polymorphism of the OPRM1 gene. Relapse was assessed after three months.

RESULTS: In all three samples, participants with the minor OPRM1 G-Allele (G+ carriers) showed increased expression of the PIT effect in the absence of learning differences. Relapse was not associated with the OPRM1 polymorphism. Instead, G+ carriers displaying increased PIT effects were particularly prone to relapse.

CONCLUSION: These results support a role for the opioid system in incentive salience motivation. Furthermore, they inform a mechanistic model of aberrant salience processing and are in line with the pharmacological potential of opioid receptor targets in the treatment of AD.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)566-578
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Psychopharmacology
Volume35
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - May 2021
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMedCentral PMC8155738
Scopus 85102677301
ORCID /0000-0001-5398-5569/work/150329515

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goals

Keywords

  • Adolescent, Adult, Alcoholism/psychology, Case-Control Studies, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptors, Opioid, mu/genetics, Recurrence, Reward, Transfer, Psychology