Airway Management in Thoracic Anesthesia
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
- University of Valencia
- Ghent University
- Radboud University Nijmegen
- Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar Universitesi
- Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB)
- Mansoura University
- Helios Clinic for Heart Surgery Karlsruhe
- Juntendo University
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena
- University of Cape Town
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
- Imperial College London
- University of Debrecen
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
- Istanbul University
- Aalborg University
- ULSS6 Euganea Cittadella (PD)
- University Medical Centre Ljubljana
- Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
- University of Barcelona
- The Aga Khan University Kenya
- University of Geneva
- Sant'Andrea Hospital
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
- IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano (Milano)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC)
- SANADOR Clinical Hospital
- University of Lausanne
- Righospitalet
- University of Glasgow
- Kore University of Enna
- UOC Rianimazione PO Giovanni Paolo II
- Medical University of Vienna
- Outcomes Research Consortium
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
- Mersin University
Abstract
This article is the third in a series of articles prepared as part of a comprehensive, international and professional society–approved consensus project to advise on thoracic anesthesia. It represents the views and structured opinions of experts delegated to the Airway Management Task Force of the Thoracic Subcommittee of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC). This review highlights the main concepts and expert opinion of international leaders on the task of lung isolation and separation, as well as the current recommendations on the benefits and disadvantages of different devices in both routine and difficult airway scenarios. The consensus statement addresses the following main clinical topics and questions: (1) What are the overall goals and means of lung isolation and separation? (2) What are the best practices for using double-lumen tubes? (3) What is the role of alternative devices, specifically bronchial blockers? (4) What are the best practices for managing a difficult airway? (5) What are the recommendations for special cases? (6) What are the research priorities for thoracic anesthesia regarding airway management? The authors conclude with a brief reference to how these recommendations relate to the concepts of good clinical practice and enhanced recovery. The document was developed and formally evaluated by senior clinicians representing the core membership of the EACTAIC Thoracic Subcommittee from Europe, the United States, Africa, and the Middle East. Although the high-level evidence base is generally limited and significant controversies remain, all recommendations of the Task Force achieved an agreed (>60%), strong (>80%), or sometimes full (>95%) consensus. This consensus should serve as a consolidation of diverse practices of thoracic anesthesia and a starting point toward obtaining stronger evidence to further enhance our clinical practice in the future.
Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 5 Dec 2025 |
| Peer-reviewed | Yes |
External IDs
| PubMed | 41353026 |
|---|---|
| ORCID | /0000-0003-4397-1467/work/202354129 |
Keywords
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Keywords
- bronchial blocker, difficult airway, double-lumen tube, flexible fiberoptic/video bronchoscopy, minimally invasive thoracic surgery, one-lung ventilation